2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2012.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Fractures of the Tibial Diaphysis Using External Fixator Compared with Locked Intramedullary Nails

Abstract: Objective To compare efficiency of external fixator in modular form with unilateral and uniplanar intramedullary locked seeking definitive treatment of fractures of the tibia diaphysis. Methods Orthopedic surgical treatments were compared to 50 patients with definite diafisaria fracture of the tibia, through the use of the external fixator, modular and intramedullary locked. The fractures were treated at emergency hospital school of External fixators Orthopedics and Tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Internal fixation using intramedullary nailing for segmental tibial fractures is associated with a high union rate 13 ; however, use of intramedullary nails in high energy or open fracture can cause decreased circulation, endosteal necrosis, and elevation of compartment pressures, and is associated with an increased risk of infection 14 .Good initial reduction is important and has a significantly faster healing time, regardless of the type of fixator that is applied. 15 Several reports have described the use of a two-stage protocol for the treatment of open,severe high energy tibial fractures.In those studies,patients had initial treatment with an external fixator followed by a delayed open reduction and internal fixation once the soft tissue envelope have sufficiently healed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Internal fixation using intramedullary nailing for segmental tibial fractures is associated with a high union rate 13 ; however, use of intramedullary nails in high energy or open fracture can cause decreased circulation, endosteal necrosis, and elevation of compartment pressures, and is associated with an increased risk of infection 14 .Good initial reduction is important and has a significantly faster healing time, regardless of the type of fixator that is applied. 15 Several reports have described the use of a two-stage protocol for the treatment of open,severe high energy tibial fractures.In those studies,patients had initial treatment with an external fixator followed by a delayed open reduction and internal fixation once the soft tissue envelope have sufficiently healed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%