2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbe.2018.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phylogeny of the Augochlora clade with the description of four new species (Hymenoptera, Apoidea)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 867 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generalist trends within eusocial bees have been hypothesized as a response to the (1) high number of individuals in the nest (high demand for resources in the nest and high abundances in the field), (2) eusocial colonies are active throughout the year (especially in tropical zones), and (3) labor division supports a higher diversity of interactions (independent search combined to recruitment foraging behavior) (Lichtenberg et al, 2010;Maia et al, 2019). From the 13 genera of specialist bees identified in the present study, one is a cleptoparasitic (Acanthopus), one is a representative of an oligolectic and solitary clade (Alepidosceles), four are solitary (Anthodioctes, Ariphanarthra, Centris, and Ceratina) and seven present some degree of sociality, from the formation of aggregated nesting sites (Caenohalictus and Callonychium), communal behavior (Agapostemon and Augochlora), variable social behavior (Augochlorella and Augochloropsis), and the primitively eusocial bumblebees (genus Bombus) (Janjic and Packer, 2003;Alves dos Santos, 2004;Coelho, 2004;Michener, 2007;Gonçalves, 2016;Gonçalves, 2019). Although most specialist species are solitary, some are also social, as found in undisturbed forests of north America (Villalobos et al, 2019); thus, both social and solitary bees are prone to adopt specialist behavior (Classen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Specialism and Evolutionary Distinctivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalist trends within eusocial bees have been hypothesized as a response to the (1) high number of individuals in the nest (high demand for resources in the nest and high abundances in the field), (2) eusocial colonies are active throughout the year (especially in tropical zones), and (3) labor division supports a higher diversity of interactions (independent search combined to recruitment foraging behavior) (Lichtenberg et al, 2010;Maia et al, 2019). From the 13 genera of specialist bees identified in the present study, one is a cleptoparasitic (Acanthopus), one is a representative of an oligolectic and solitary clade (Alepidosceles), four are solitary (Anthodioctes, Ariphanarthra, Centris, and Ceratina) and seven present some degree of sociality, from the formation of aggregated nesting sites (Caenohalictus and Callonychium), communal behavior (Agapostemon and Augochlora), variable social behavior (Augochlorella and Augochloropsis), and the primitively eusocial bumblebees (genus Bombus) (Janjic and Packer, 2003;Alves dos Santos, 2004;Coelho, 2004;Michener, 2007;Gonçalves, 2016;Gonçalves, 2019). Although most specialist species are solitary, some are also social, as found in undisturbed forests of north America (Villalobos et al, 2019); thus, both social and solitary bees are prone to adopt specialist behavior (Classen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Specialism and Evolutionary Distinctivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We included seven species for the outgroups. Augochlorella comis (Vachal, 1911), Augochlorella ephyra (Schrottky, 1910), Ceratalictus clonius (Brèthes, 1909) and Pereirapis semiaurata (Spinola, 1853) as members of the Augochlora group of genera (Eickwort 1969;Engel 2000;Gonçalves 2016Gonçalves , 2019. We also included species of Augochlorini from other groups of genera, Pseudaugochlora graminea (Fabricius, 1804), Neocorynura codion (Vachal, 1904) and Thectochlora brachycera Gonçalves & Melo, 2006.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphological matrix was largely based on characters from previous studies (Engel 2000;Coelho 2004;Gonçalves 2016Gonçalves , 2019, with reinterpretations and additions where needed (Supplementary file 1: List of characters). The final matrix comprised 110 unordered characters and 47 terminals (Supplementary file 2: Morphological matrix).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations