2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.mito.2008.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)-induced expression profile of mitochondria-related genes in the mouse liver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…NRTIs can result in altered gene expression profiles. 50,51 Altered gene expression profiles have been observed in the absence of mitochondrial DNA depletion, suggesting that NRTIs can cause mitochondrial dysfunction and not inhibit mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma. 52 The association of tenofovir with mitochondrial dysfunction has been investigated.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Tenofovir-associated Bone Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NRTIs can result in altered gene expression profiles. 50,51 Altered gene expression profiles have been observed in the absence of mitochondrial DNA depletion, suggesting that NRTIs can cause mitochondrial dysfunction and not inhibit mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma. 52 The association of tenofovir with mitochondrial dysfunction has been investigated.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Tenofovir-associated Bone Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Previous studies illustrate NRTI-induced mitochondrial toxicity that causes serious adverse effects ranging from lactic acidosis to hepatic steatosis during long-term HAART treatment. 14,15 On the other hand, NNRTIs bind to an allosteric hydrophobic site, approximately 10 Å away from the polymerase active site, which is unique to HIV-1 RT and absent in host cell polymerases. 16 Therefore, unlike NRTIs, NNRTIs specifically target RT while excluding any binding interaction with other polymerases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these data were obtained using a suprapharmacological dose modeled on earlier rodent studies (15,28), they nevertheless provide proof of principle of potential toxicity to human neonates. Clearly, further in vivo studies must be conducted to establish a dose-response analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The animal treatment schedule corresponds to the treatment schedule in humans corrected for rat gestation and life span. The AZT dose was modeled after earlier rat and mouse studies (15,28). While this is a suprapharmacological dose, it was done to limit the number of animals required for a proof-of-principle study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%