2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2021.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exact model comparisons in the plausibility framework

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This interpretation is supported by the fact that ill‐conditioned design matrices most frequently appear for simulation scenarios with low LD and/or high ambiguity, both being cases where haplotype diversity is high. A major conclusion concerning model building is that models should be kept sparse or that a penalized model should be used, although for the latter statistical testing becomes challenging (Böhringer & Lohmann, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interpretation is supported by the fact that ill‐conditioned design matrices most frequently appear for simulation scenarios with low LD and/or high ambiguity, both being cases where haplotype diversity is high. A major conclusion concerning model building is that models should be kept sparse or that a penalized model should be used, although for the latter statistical testing becomes challenging (Böhringer & Lohmann, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plausibility model of Böhringer & Lohmann was used to derive a global p-value for the glmnet interaction model. [30]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plausibility model of Böhringer & Lohmann was used to derive a global p-value for the glmnet interaction model. [30] Lastly, we compared the odds ratios (OR) of SNPs for disease risk of all RA cases versus healthy controls R-package glmnet) with the ORs of cluster specific RA cases with controls. We obtained the OR from a logistic regression assuming additive effect of the minor allele.…”
Section: Genetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%