2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2021.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Newborns at high risk for brain injury: the role of the amplitude-integrated electroencephalography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(114 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concomitant recording of 5-channel EEG has shown that some short seizures, some focal discharges, or continuous peak discharges can be ignored when reading aEEG [16]. Some studies show that using two-channel aEEG, combined with the raw EEG path on the same monitor, improved the accuracy of interpretation [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concomitant recording of 5-channel EEG has shown that some short seizures, some focal discharges, or continuous peak discharges can be ignored when reading aEEG [16]. Some studies show that using two-channel aEEG, combined with the raw EEG path on the same monitor, improved the accuracy of interpretation [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve continuous and convenient monitoring, researchers have developed and promoted amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG), which can be recorded and interpreted independently by observers without expert knowledge. Amplitude-integrated EEGs have been applied in many areas to recognize neonatal brain functional state [2][3], and gained much attention in clinical over the past decades. Nevertheless, research on computer-aided automatic analysis of aEEGs is still at the early stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cerebral monitoring of the aEEG trend for seizure detection and evaluation of cortical activity, e.g., the presence of sleep-wake cycling is routinely performed in the NICU [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. While aEEG is effective for a general qualitative clinical bedside assessment, the aEEG interpretation is still a subjective assessment with a substantial inter-rater variation and consequently poor sensitivity to those effects that may accompany drug treatment or other therapeutic maneuvers [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%