2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2018.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a tool to evaluate women's satisfaction with breastfeeding for the Brazilian population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…La escala MBFES ha sido traducida a otros idiomas como el japonés 29 o el brasileño 30 obteniendo valores de consistencia interna inferiores a los observados en el contexto español (alfa de Cronbrach de 0,78 en Japón y alfa de Cronbach de 0,88 en Brasil).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…La escala MBFES ha sido traducida a otros idiomas como el japonés 29 o el brasileño 30 obteniendo valores de consistencia interna inferiores a los observados en el contexto español (alfa de Cronbrach de 0,78 en Japón y alfa de Cronbach de 0,88 en Brasil).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The outcome "maternal satisfaction with breastfeeding" was measured using the Maternal Breastfeeding Evaluation Scale (MBFES), designed by Leff et al [21] and validated for use in Brazil [22]. The original instrument comprises 30 questions and includes three subscales: pleasure and fulfillment of the maternal role; child satisfaction and growth; and maternal lifestyle and body image.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…type of feeding. Maternal satisfaction with breastfeeding was measured using the Maternal Breastfeeding Evaluation Scale (MBFES), adapted and validated for use in the Brazilian population [12]. The adapted instrument contains 29 questions on positive and negative experiences and emotions related to breastfeeding, measured using a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from "totally disagree" (1 point) to "totally agree" (5 points); for negative experiences, the scoring system is inverted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%