2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2016.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spirometry and volumetric capnography in lung function assessment of obese and normal-weight individuals without asthma

Abstract: Even without the diagnosis of asthma by clinical criteria and without response to bronchodilator use, obese individuals showed lower FEV/FVC values and forced expiratory flow, indicating the presence of an obstructive process. Volumetric capnography showed that obese individuals had higher alveolar tidal volume, with no alterations in ventilation homogeneity, suggesting flow alterations, without affecting lung volumes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, including children with previous respiratory diseases could evolve into sampling (selection of individuals), confounding (proven impact on outcomes) or information bias (previous knowledge of an existing problem). In this context, 66.7% (22/33) [ 12 15 , 17 21 , 25 , 26 , 29 , 32 – 37 , 39 42 ] of the studies excluded individuals with respiratory diseases, 27.3% (9/33) [ 16 , 22 24 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 38 ] did not mention respiratory diseases as a factor of exclusion or non-inclusion, and 6% (2/33) [ 11 , 43 ] excluded only individuals with a history of smoking. Among the studies that excluded previous respiratory diseases, several exclusion criteria could be observed: some authors excluded only individuals with exacerbation of asthma or cough; others excluded any respiratory conditions that might impair the evaluation; and others used standardized instruments such as the ISAAC questionnaire (The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, including children with previous respiratory diseases could evolve into sampling (selection of individuals), confounding (proven impact on outcomes) or information bias (previous knowledge of an existing problem). In this context, 66.7% (22/33) [ 12 15 , 17 21 , 25 , 26 , 29 , 32 – 37 , 39 42 ] of the studies excluded individuals with respiratory diseases, 27.3% (9/33) [ 16 , 22 24 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 38 ] did not mention respiratory diseases as a factor of exclusion or non-inclusion, and 6% (2/33) [ 11 , 43 ] excluded only individuals with a history of smoking. Among the studies that excluded previous respiratory diseases, several exclusion criteria could be observed: some authors excluded only individuals with exacerbation of asthma or cough; others excluded any respiratory conditions that might impair the evaluation; and others used standardized instruments such as the ISAAC questionnaire (The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The articles included were produced in 18 countries, with a predominance of European (8) [ 21 23 , 31 , 34 , 35 , 40 ], South American (8) [ 17 , 18 , 26 , 32 , 33 , 37 , 39 , 41 ] and Asian (7) [ 11 , 13 , 15 , 27 , 30 , 31 , 42 ] countries. Also, 4 studies from North America were included [ 19 , 24 , 38 , 43 ], as well as one from Central America [ 29 ], one from Oceania [ 20 ] and four from intercontinental countries ( three Euroasians [ 14 , 25 , 36 ] and one from Asia and Oceania [ 12 ]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations