2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of strain bursts in high density polyethylene by means of a novel nano creep test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on Equations (10) and (11), the corresponding activation energies for processes 1 and 2 are 28.96 and 73.25 kJ/mol, respectively, which can be used to quantify the energy barriers for relaxation introduced in the RR test. These values are in the same order of magnitude as those reported in the literature, such as Wilhelm et al[53] who used creep test data for PE100 pipe resin and determined the activation energy for one Eyring's process to be 30 kJ/mol and Truss et al[54] who used torsion test data for HDPE with the density of 0.972 g/cm 3 and determined the activation energies for yielding using two Eyring's process connected in parallel to be 243 and 100 kJ/mol.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on Equations (10) and (11), the corresponding activation energies for processes 1 and 2 are 28.96 and 73.25 kJ/mol, respectively, which can be used to quantify the energy barriers for relaxation introduced in the RR test. These values are in the same order of magnitude as those reported in the literature, such as Wilhelm et al[53] who used creep test data for PE100 pipe resin and determined the activation energy for one Eyring's process to be 30 kJ/mol and Truss et al[54] who used torsion test data for HDPE with the density of 0.972 g/cm 3 and determined the activation energies for yielding using two Eyring's process connected in parallel to be 243 and 100 kJ/mol.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Based on Equations (10) and (11), the corresponding activation energies for processes 1 and 2 are 28.96 and 73.25 kJ/mol, respectively, which can be used to quantify the energy barriers for relaxation introduced in the RR test. These values are in the same order of magnitude as those reported in the literature, such as Wilhelm et al[53] who used creep test data for PE100 pipe resin and determined the activation energy for one Eyring's process to be 30 kJ/mol and Truss et al[54] who used torsion test data for HDPE with the density of 0.972 g/cm3 and determined the activation energies for yielding using two Eyring's process connected in parallel to be 243 and 100 kJ/mol.As suggested by André and Cruz-Pinto[55], in addition to the dependence on materials, different loading modes may also yield different values for the activation energies. Therefore, a further study on the effect of the loading mode on the activation energy will be conducted based on the principle of the RR test presented here.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Pelto et al [21] studied the influence of different types of nanofillers on the tribological properties of the surface of HDPE composites. In some cases, the coefficient of friction and wear has been reduced with the addition of a small amount of nanofiller [21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. In certain cases, it is appropriate to modify the thermal conductivity, which is generally poor for all polymeric materials, as these are thermal insulators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%