2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.htct.2020.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Platelet antibodies identification: comparison between two laboratory tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, our cohort size was greater. The MAIPA test may be less sensitive than the Luminex method [21]. However, classical HLA class I alloantibodies' detection from platelet lysis using the MAIPA technique (ApDIA ® ) is as sensitive as the Luminex technique [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of note, our cohort size was greater. The MAIPA test may be less sensitive than the Luminex method [21]. However, classical HLA class I alloantibodies' detection from platelet lysis using the MAIPA technique (ApDIA ® ) is as sensitive as the Luminex technique [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MAIPA test may be less sensitive than the Luminex method [21]. However, classical HLA class I alloantibodies' detection from platelet lysis using the MAIPA technique (ApDIA ® ) is as sensitive as the Luminex technique [21]. The HLA-G-antibody calibrated standard would allow sensitivity comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%