2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjp.2017.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecuadorian honey types described by Kichwa community in Rio Chico, Pastaza province, Ecuador using Free-Choice Profiling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At least 100 more species have cultural and medicinal importance. Further, the use of common names reveals that, in an analysis of 76 ethnic names for Ecuador (Vit et al, 2017), and over 50 names used by two indigenous peoples in Amazonas state, Brazil (Oliveira et al, 2013), the species with multiple names are likely most important. In Mesoamerica M. beecheii has at least 20 different local names (Arnold et al, 2018;Quezada-Euán, 2018), while T. angustula had seven common names in Ecuador and Melipona grandis Guérin, in central Brazil, had eight (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At least 100 more species have cultural and medicinal importance. Further, the use of common names reveals that, in an analysis of 76 ethnic names for Ecuador (Vit et al, 2017), and over 50 names used by two indigenous peoples in Amazonas state, Brazil (Oliveira et al, 2013), the species with multiple names are likely most important. In Mesoamerica M. beecheii has at least 20 different local names (Arnold et al, 2018;Quezada-Euán, 2018), while T. angustula had seven common names in Ecuador and Melipona grandis Guérin, in central Brazil, had eight (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are able to describe and to differentiate honey types without previous sensory training. This suggests Ecuadorian native Kichwa maintain a sensory legacy by teaching new generations how to identify different honeys by taste (Vit et al, 2017).…”
Section: South Americamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apis mellifera honey was perceived as a viscous and adhesive product, probably taken as a standard for honey sensory attributes and expected by consumers . In another study, the principal component analysis separated two honeys of Apis mellifera as thicker samples in relation to honeys from stingless bees …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por otro lado, las mieles de las abejas sin aguijón también llamadas abejas nativas o meliponinos, son productos con características diferentes entre sí (pues provienen de una gran variedad de géneros de abejas) y sobre todo comparadas con la miel de las abejas melíferas. Se reporta que estas mieles presentan sabores amargos, salados, dulces y/o astringentes, con aromas de cítricos, florales, fermentados, con mayor viscosidad (respecto a la miel de melíferas) y una amplia variedad de colores (Batista de Sousa et al, 2016;Vit et al, 2017). En comparación con la miel de abejas melíferas, las mieles de los meliponinos tienen contenidos altos de agua, acidez libre, conductividad eléctrica, maltosa y nitrógeno (Vit et al, 1994(Vit et al, , 1998.…”
Section: P a L A B R A S C L A V Eunclassified
“…On the other hand, honey from stingless bees, also called native bees or meliponines, are products with different characteristics from each other (because they come from a great variety of bee genera) and especially from the honey of western honey bees. These honeys have bitter, salty, sweet, and/or astringent flavors, with citrus, floral, fermented aromas, higher viscosity (with respect to honey from western honey bees), and a wide variety of colors (Batista de Sousa et al, 2016;Vit et al, 2017). Compared to honey from western honey bees, meliponine honey has higher water content, free acidity, electrical conductivity, maltose, and nitrogen (Vit et al, 1994;1998).…”
Section: P a L A B R A S C L A V Ementioning
confidence: 99%