2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sandwich graft technique outcomes in medium and large size nasal septal perforations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach was adopted by others who later published case series. 28 Indeed, there have been Turkish and Chinese case reviews of similar techniques, using costal cartilage and anterior rectus abdominis fascia, 29 additional free mucosal flaps, 30 or a sandwich‐like fascia separation. 31 Here, we are excited to present the first results from the original and largest cohort to date.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach was adopted by others who later published case series. 28 Indeed, there have been Turkish and Chinese case reviews of similar techniques, using costal cartilage and anterior rectus abdominis fascia, 29 additional free mucosal flaps, 30 or a sandwich‐like fascia separation. 31 Here, we are excited to present the first results from the original and largest cohort to date.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While pedicled flaps maintain their own blood supply and rotate or advance mucosa over the perforation, interposition grafts serve as a scaffold that depends on mucosal regrowth across the graft over time. 41 These are often placed between mucosal flaps that are elevated on either side of the perforation. Multiple different graft options have been described including septal or conchal cartilage, temporalis or mastoid fascia, pericranium, acellular human dermis (Alloderm), and polydioxanone (PDS), though several studies have shown no significant difference in success rate by type of graft.…”
Section: Interposition Graftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-validated visual analog scales, Likert scales, and symptom inventories have been applied to perforation evaluation and treatment. [1][2][3][4][5][6] Validated patient-reported outcome measures are an established standard for objectively identifying disease-related symptoms and response to treatment. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) have been used to evaluate perforation symptomatology and response to treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%