Translation and validation of the drooling impact scale questionnaire into Brazilian Portuguese

Cavalcanti, Natália Silva; Sekine, Leo; Manica, Denise; Farenzena, Maurício; Neto, Cátia de Souza Saleh; Maróstica, Paulo José Cauduro; Schweiger, Cláudia

doi:10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.09.003

Cited by 3 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The primary purpose of assessment was predictive for bib count [ 20 ] and bib weight [ 21 ], discriminative for the Modified drooling questionnaire [ 30 ], the 5-min Drooling Quotient (DQ5) [ 24 ], the Drooling Infants and Preschoolers Scale (DRIPS) [ 25 ], and the Blasco Index for the assessment of drooling [ 1 ], evaluative for all the others [ 6 , 8 , 22 , 23 , 26 – 29 , 31 , 33 – 35 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A higher value represents a worse outcome DIS-F [ 32 ] Children with CP and drooling, 4–18 y; 32 M, 23F Control group ( n = 33), intervention group ( n = 22) Observational, parent report; NR; yes; no The total score is reported and is calculated by adding the score of all 10 subscales. A higher value represents a worse outcome Brazilian Portuguese language version of DIS [ 33 ] Children or adolescent with drooling 19.75 − 150.75 months; 20 M, 20F, 40 Observational, parent report; NR; yes; no The total score is reported and is calculated by adding the score of all 10 subscales. A higher value represents a worse outcome Drooling impact questionnaire (short version) [ 6 , 36 ] Children or adolescent with drooling, 7–19y; 5 M, 5F 10 Observational, parent report; NR; yes; no NR Children with CP and severe drooling, 3–16 y; 28 M, 17F 45 Observational, parent report; NR; yes; no NR Questionnaire to evaluate impact of drooling on daily living (questionnaire 1) [ 8 ] Children with CP and severe drooling; 3–16 y; 28 M, 17F 45 Observational, parent report; NR; yes; no NR Questionnaire to evaluate impact of drooling on daily living (questionnaire 2) [ 8 ] Children with CP and severe drooling; 3–16 y; 28 M, 17F 45 Observational, parent report; NR; yes; no NR DDISQ [ 34 ] NR NR Observational, parent report; NR; yes; no NR Drool rating scale [ 35 ] …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…With regard to measurement properties, data for both reliability and validity were available for the DQ5 [ 24 ], the modified drooling questionnaire [ 30 ], the DIS [ 31 ], the French version of Drooling Impact Scale (DIS-F) [ 32 ], the Brazilian Portuguese language version of DIS [ 33 ], the TDS [ 27 ], the DQ [ 23 ], and the DRIPS [ 25 ]. The Drooling Impact Questionnaire (short version) [ 6 , 36 ], the questionnaire to evaluate impact of drooling on daily living (questionnaires 1 and 2) [ 8 ], bib count [ 20 ], bib weight [ 21 ], the Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale (DSFS) [ 26 ], the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) [ 29 ], and the Daniel Drooling Impact Score Questionnaire (DDISQ) [ 34 ], reported only data on validity.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Standard error of measurement = 2.6 (+) α Cronbach. = 0.71 (+) Brazilian Portuguese language version of DIS [ 33 ] NR NR NR NR NR α Cronbach. > 0.72 (+) Drooling impact questionnaire (short version) [ 6 , 36 ] NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Questionnaire to evaluate impact of drooling on daily living (questionnaire 1 and questionnaire 2) [ 8 ] NR NR NR NR NR NR DDISQ [ 34 ] NR NR NR NR NR NR Drool rating scale [ 35 ] NR NR NR NR NR NR CI confidence interval, DDISQ Daniel Drooling Impact Score Questionnaire, DIS Drooling Impact Scale, DIS-F French version of Drooling Impact Scale, DQ Drooling Quotient, DQ5 5-min Drooling Quotient, DQ5A 5-min Drooling Quotient during activities, DQ5R 5-min Drooling Quotient at rest, DRIPS Drooling Infants and Preschoolers Scale, DSFS Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale, ICC intraclass correlation coefficient, K kappa coefficient, NA not applicable, SD standa...…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For the DIS [ 31 ], the DIS-F [ 32 ], and the Brazilian Portuguese language version of DIS [ 33 ], although most items of measurement properties in the checklist were rated positively, the overall score was rated as ‘doubtful’, due to lack of clarity on how missing items were handled. For both TDS [ 27 ] and DQ [ 23 ], measurement analysis was considered unsatisfactory.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Drooling outcome measures in paediatric disability: a systematic review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Drooling, or sialorrhea, is a common condition in patients with cerebral palsy, rare diseases, and neurodevelopmental disorders. The goal of this review was to identify the different properties of sialorrhea outcome measures in children. Four databases were analysed in search of sialorrhea measurement tools, and the review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used for quality appraisal of the outcome measures. The initial search yielded 891 articles, 430 of which were duplicates. Thus, 461 full-text articles were evaluated. Among these, 21 met the inclusion criteria, reporting 19 different outcome measures that encompassed both quantitative measures and parent/proxy questionnaires. Conclusions: Among the outcome measures found through this review, the 5-min Drooling Quotient can objectively discriminate sialorrhea frequency in patients with developmental disabilities. The Drooling Impact Scale can be used to evaluate changes after treatment. The modified drooling questionnaire can measure sialorrhea severity and its social acceptability. To date, the tests proposed in this review are the only tools displaying adequate measurement properties. The acquisition of new data about reliability, validity, and responsiveness of these tests will confirm our findings. What is Known:• Although sialorrhea is a recognized problem in children with disabilities, especially those with cerebral palsy (CP), there is a lack of confidence among physicians in measuring sialorrhea. What is New:• Few sialorrhea measures are available for clinicians that may guide decision-making and at the same time have strong evidence to provide confidence in the results.• A combination of both quantitative measures and parent/proxy questionnaires might provide an adequate measurement of sialorrhea in children.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Drooling outcome measures in paediatric disability: a systematic review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Development of the Korean Version of the Drooling Infants and Preschoolers Scale

Min¹,

Hong²,

Hong

et al. 2023

Occupational Therapy International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. This study is aimed at translating and cross-culturally adapting the Drooling Infants and Preschoolers Scale (DRIPS) into Korean cultural context and examine the content validity and reliability of the Korean version, which is referred as K-DRIPS. Methods. An iterative forward-backward translation sequence of the DRIPS was performed by 20 Korean health professional experts (i.e., occupational therapists (OTs) and professors) with more than 10 years of experience. The study subjects were 77 children with cerebral palsy (CP) exhibiting drooling symptoms aged 2-7 years. They were recruited from two children’s rehabilitation hospitals in Korea and completed the K-DRIPS. The content validity and internal consistency of the K-DRIPS items were examined. Results. An assessment with 20 K-DRIPS items was adequately and cross-culturally adapted into Korea. All the items exhibited good content validity (content validity ratio range 4.00-4.95) and good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.98 ). Conclusion. The study findings indicated that the K-DRIPS was successfully adapted to the Korean cultural context and demonstrated good psychometric properties. This instrument could be used for drooling assessment tool in Korean children with disabilities.

show abstract

Cross-Cultural Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Quality of Oncology Nursing Care Scale

Gomes,

Ribeiro,

Silva

et al. 2024

Cancers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Quality assessment in oncology nursing care has been a growing topic in the literature, gaining relevance as oncological nursing care becomes more complex as the science progresses. However, there are no instruments that assess the perception of the quality of oncology nursing care from the point of view of patients for the Portuguese population. Thus, the cross-cultural translation and validation of the Quality of Oncology Nursing Care Scale (QONCS) was performed for the Portuguese context. This instrument allows nurses to assess patients’ self-perception of the quality of nursing care provided in an oncological setting. It also allows researchers to compare the results obtained internationally with the application of this scale. Methods: This is a methodological study, with two distinct phases: the first corresponded to the translation and cultural adaptation of the scale to the Portuguese context, and the second consisted of the psychometric validation of the QONCS, which included factor analysis and the evaluation of the psychometric properties of the instrument. We obtained responses from 402 patients from a Portuguese oncology hospital. Results: The Portuguese version of the Quality of Oncology Nursing Care Scale (QONCS_PT) consists of 34 items inserted into a tetra-factorial model, which explains a total variance of the instrument of 69.8%. A Cronbach’s alpha of 0.93 was obtained for the complete instrument. Conclusions: QONCS_PT has a competent and reliable structure. The scale’s validity was assured and can be used in the Portuguese population, as it is useful for direct care provision but also for researchers and managers.

show abstract

Translation and validation of the drooling impact scale questionnaire into Brazilian Portuguese

Cited by 3 publications

References 13 publications

Drooling outcome measures in paediatric disability: a systematic review

Drooling outcome measures in paediatric disability: a systematic review

Development of the Korean Version of the Drooling Infants and Preschoolers Scale

Cross-Cultural Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Quality of Oncology Nursing Care Scale

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About