Evaluation of postoperative satisfaction with rhinoseptoplasty in patients with symptoms of body dysmorphic disorder

Rabaioli, Luísi; Oppermann, Paula de Oliveira; Pilati, Natália Paseto; Klein, Cássia Feijó Gomes; Bernardi, Bárbara Luiza; Migliavacca, Raphaella; Lavinsky‐Wolff, Michelle

doi:10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.07.013

Cited by 22 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Multiple studies have analyzed the impact of rhinoseptoplasty on a patient's life [11,12]. These studies show that patients benefit from an increased quality of sleep and concentration and that symptoms such as a runny nose, nasal obstruction, and fatigue are resolved [11]. According to the literature, no cases of rhinoseptoplasty carried out in blind patients have been reported.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rhinoseptoplasty in a Blind Patient: A Case Report

Elsayed¹,

Mandora²,

Hafiz³

et al. 2022

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vision seems to be the first to recognize a potential threat, subconsciously recording and processing the image. Visual discrimination happens at a subcortical level after an environmental image is recorded in midbrain tissues. Aesthetics and beauty have been found to be decoded subconsciously in the amygdala, similar to a frightening threat. Therefore, blind patients can detect beauty by embodied primal senses other than vision. It could be processed without conscious thought, in the same way, that an immediate threat is. Here, we present a case of a 55-year-old male who has had bilateral blindness for 15 years and came to a rhinoplasty clinic seeking help for nasal obstruction and difficulty breathing due to an old history of trauma since adolescence, causing nasal deviation. He asked for both aesthetic and functional corrections. Rhinoseptoplasty was done successfully, significantly impacting the quality of life and psychosocial distress.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rhinoseptoplasty in a Blind Patient: A Case Report

Elsayed¹,

Mandora²,

Hafiz³

et al. 2022

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Papers were thoroughly read, discussed, and considered for the meta-analysis and major data reported [ Table 1 ]. [ 14 16 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 ]…”

Section: Aterials and M Ethodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review and meta-analysis of rhinoplasty using the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation scale

Chirumbolo

Nocini

Pirayesh

et al. 2022

Ann Maxillofac Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The purpose was to evaluate the role and impact of the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) in rhinoplasty. Objectives: To systematically review the ability of ROE to assess rhinoplasty outcome in the very recent surgical approaches. Data Sources: Searching MESH terms “rhinoplasty” and “rhinoplasty and ROE” on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, and other major literature databases. Study Eligibility Criteria: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses model was adopted for eligibility criteria. Participants and Interventions: A first large screening on 1,660 papers allowed the final retrieval of 896 reports, of which only 101 were eligible for all the inclusion criteria, which allowed finally to select a group of 12 reports published in the time range 2018–2021. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods: Meta-regression with Durbin–Watson test, checking of meta-analysis bias with Rosenthal’s estimator, and heterogeneity through the I 2 statistics were performed. The analysis included a Mantel–Haenszel test and associated or meta-analysis. Results: Twelve eligible and qualified papers were included in the meta-analysis, out of 1,263 patients, from 1,660 papers. ROE confirmed previous reports about its ability to discriminate preoperative from postoperative outcome (50/100), as from the different rhinoplasty approaches, a value very close to the functional Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale. This study strengthens the role of ROE in the evaluation of rhinoplasty outcomes encouraging further research to improve ROE scale on different cultural habits and geographical areas. Limitations: The main limitations were due to the weak inclusion and exclusion criteria, methodological flaws with the statistical analysis, and poor data synthesis and evaluation in many papers about ROE.

show abstract

“…The autologous septal cartilage is used in approximately 95% of cases where the graft is need because it is easy to harvest, it can be used in multiple areas, and can be single-or double-layered when a greater amount of graft is required it can be harvest from the concha or costal cartilage. 3 The surgical procedure for septoplasty is described as follows: First, a mucous incision and dissection to allow adequate visualization of the cartilaginous perichondrium complex, then a separation of the septal mucosa unilateral or bilaterally, preserving it from rupture, follow for the resection or section of the cartilage for therapeutic convenience. Then the Replacement of the remaining septal cartilage.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Anatomical and functional factors of the nasal septum determine its surgical requirements after a nasoseptal fracture, 2 or anatomical changes after upper jaw repositioning due to orthognathic surgery, 3 and congenital nasal deformity, in some cases, it is necessary to harvest a nasal septal graft for reconstructive or aesthetic outcomes.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%