2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vestibular implant: does it really work? A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first tool evaluates the methodological quality of case reports and the second tool evaluates the methodological quality of case series. The quality of the studies was classified using the following categories: low (score up to 49.0%), moderate (score between 50.0% and 70.0%), and high (score above 70.0%) (23) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first tool evaluates the methodological quality of case reports and the second tool evaluates the methodological quality of case series. The quality of the studies was classified using the following categories: low (score up to 49.0%), moderate (score between 50.0% and 70.0%), and high (score above 70.0%) (23) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A ferramenta de avaliação crítica consiste em uma lista de verificação contendo 11 perguntas respondidas por "yes", "no", "unclear" ou "not applicable". Quanto maior o número de "yes" obtidas, maior o rigor metodológico do estudo e menor o risco de viés e a classificação segue: menor risco de viés quando é acima de 70%, risco moderado de 50 a 70% e risco alto de viés até 49% (Azevedo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Metodologiaunclassified
“…20 This tool enabled the researchers to order each study in three possible groups: high risk of bias (up to 49%), moderate risk of bias (from 50% to 70%), and low risk of bias (above 70%). 21…”
Section: Quality Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%