2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of epidermal growth factor on the pseudo-healing of traumatic tympanic membrane perforations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, there were no significant differences between EGF alone and Gelfoam patching in closure rate (97.8% vs. 86.7%, respectively, P = 0.039) or average closure time (11.12 ± 4.60 vs. 13.67 ± 5.379 days, P = 0.071) [ 44 ]. However, Lou [ 46 ] used EGF alone to treat 24 adult chronic traumatic perforations and reported a closure rate of 100% within 6.1 ± 2.3 days.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, there were no significant differences between EGF alone and Gelfoam patching in closure rate (97.8% vs. 86.7%, respectively, P = 0.039) or average closure time (11.12 ± 4.60 vs. 13.67 ± 5.379 days, P = 0.071) [ 44 ]. However, Lou [ 46 ] used EGF alone to treat 24 adult chronic traumatic perforations and reported a closure rate of 100% within 6.1 ± 2.3 days.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, 26 articles did not meet the inclusion criteria, and only the remaining 47 articles were included in the analysis. Of the 47 papers, 18 were experimental studies of the effects of FGF2 or EGF in repair of acute or chronic perforations [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] (Table 1), 16 were clinical studies in human acute perforations (FGF2 in 11 and EGF in 5) [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] (Table 2), nine were clinical studies in human chronic perforations (FGF2 in eight and EGF in one) [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] (Table 3), and four papers examined the dose-and time-dependent effects of FGF2 or EGF on human and...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Biomolecule Results Model TM perforation Refs. EGF 100% closure rate range 3–12 days Human Chronic [68] EGF 96.2% closure rate range 3–14 days Human Subacute [69] Fat graft soaked in PRP Increase in adipocyte area, decrease in granulation tissue area in comparison to fat graft alone Rat Acute [70] FGF-2 98.1% closure for non-pathological TMP, 10.1 ± 4.6 days Human Not specified [71] 86.7% closure rate for pathological TMP, 19.1 ± 7.3 days 1% HyA topical application 52% closure Human Acute and chronic, 1–3 mm [15] 36% TMP size reduction. Time of closure not specified EGF and FGF-2 EGF – 91.11% closure rate 9-16.5 days Human Acute dry [72] FGF-2 – 93.18% closure rate 7-15 days Human Insulin Accelerated healing, 100% closure 5-7days.…”
Section: Strategies Focusing On Growth Factors/biomoleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EGF protects the zone of stasis tissue from burn damage [79]. It can also correct the pseudo-healing of traumatic tympanic membrane perforations, after daily application over six months, to keep the membrane moist [80]. In patients with diabetic foot ulcers, parenteral administration of EGF on epithelial tissue has a positive effect on the healing process [81].…”
Section: Epidermal Growth Factor and Wound Healingmentioning
confidence: 99%