2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of risk factors for residual cholesteatoma in children and adults: a retrospective study on 110 cases of revision surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recurrence rates of this study, which were 23.3 per cent in adults and 45.5 per cent in children, are in line with previous literature. 3,4,6,7 Despite the acknowledged importance of an experienced surgeon, the operating surgeon was not identified as a risk factor for recurrence in our study. 3 We were able to identify childhood and a low tegmen as risk factors for recurrence, especially when both these risk factors are present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The recurrence rates of this study, which were 23.3 per cent in adults and 45.5 per cent in children, are in line with previous literature. 3,4,6,7 Despite the acknowledged importance of an experienced surgeon, the operating surgeon was not identified as a risk factor for recurrence in our study. 3 We were able to identify childhood and a low tegmen as risk factors for recurrence, especially when both these risk factors are present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…3,4,6,7 Despite the acknowledged importance of an experienced surgeon, the operating surgeon was not identified as a risk factor for recurrence in our study. 3 We were able to identify childhood and a low tegmen as risk factors for recurrence, especially when both these risk factors are present. Previous research showed that cholesteatomas are more aggressive in children than in adults; this is in line with our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations