Evaluation of aesthetic and functional outcomes in rhinoplasty surgery: a prospective study

Esteves, Sara Sena; Ferreira, Miguel Gonçalves; Almeida, João Carvalho; Abrunhosa, José; Sousa, Cecília Almeida e

doi:10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.06.010

Cited by 44 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[9] Estetik beklentinin ön planda olduğu olgularda memnuniyetsizlik oranları yüksek iken, beraberinde nazal tıkanıklık olan olgularda bu tıkanıklığın ameliyatla ortadan kaldırılması başarı oranlarını yükseltmektedir. [7] Burun şekillendirme cerrahisinde osteotomiler son derece önemlidir ve bazı olgularda vazgeçilmezdir. Lateral, median ve double osteotomiler; bunların uygulama teknikleri perkütan ve endonazal osteotomi şekilleri ve klasik guj çekiç, testere kullanımı ve nihayet piezzo cerrahi enstrümantasyonlarının kullanımları ve bunların modifikasyonlarına ilişkin çalışmalar bildirilmiştir.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…Septorinoplastilerin uzun dönem fonksiyonel ve estetik sonuçlarını, kişinin beklentileri, sosyoekonomik durumu, eğitim düzeyi ve sosyal çevre gibi önemli unsurlar belirlemektedir. [6,7] Ameliyat sonrası meydana gelebilecek görsel sorunlarla ilgilenen hasta memnuniyeti ve sosyal yaşam kalitesine ilişkin çalışmalar giderek artmaktadır. [8,9] Ödem, ağrı, ekimoz gibi geçici sorunların yanında, sonradan ortaya çıkan ve kalıcı olabilen sorunların en önemlisi hasta memnuniyetsizliğidir.…”

Section: Methodsunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of the efficacy of the use of an osteotome versus concave saw blade in lateral osteotomy during septorhinoplasty surgeries

Demirbilek¹

2020

KBB Uygulamaları

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionunclassified

Section: Methodsunclassified

Comparison of the efficacy of the use of an osteotome versus concave saw blade in lateral osteotomy during septorhinoplasty surgeries

Demirbilek¹

2020

KBB Uygulamaları

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…12,13 This procedure is among the most common surgeries performed by facial plastic surgeons worldwide, and patient satisfaction is the principal outcome measure of success in facial cosmetic surgeries. 14,15 In literature, numerous validated outcome instruments are available to quantify the patient's perspective on nasal appearance. 16,17 Nowadays, it is well established that patient-reported outcome measurements are of equal importance as photo documentation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spare roof technique in reduction rhinoplasty: Prospective study of the first one hundred patients

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Assess the aesthetic and functional outcomes of the first 100 patients who underwent reduction rhinoplasty with the spare roof technique (SRT). Methods Prospective, interventional, and longitudinal study performed on consecutive patients undergoing primary rhinoplasty by SRT. All the surgical procedures were performed by the surgeon who first described this technique. The validated Portuguese version of the Utrecht Questionnaire for Outcome Assessment in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty was used. Patients completed the questionnaire presurgery and again 3 and 12 months postsurgery. In addition, a visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to score nasal patency for both sides. Results The study population included 100 Caucasian Mediterranean patients (33 males; 67 females). Mean age at surgery was 32.8 years. Analysis of the preoperative and postoperative mean aesthetic VAS scores showed a significant improvement from 3.67 to 8.1 (P < 0.001) and 8.44 (P < 0.001), respectively, 3 and 12 months postsurgery. Analysis of the five aesthetic Likert scale questions all showed a highly significant improvement after rhinoplasty. The mean preoperative aesthetic sum score was 13.9, which improved to 8.26 and 7.08, respectively, 3 and 12 months postsurgery (P < 0.001), indicating a significant improvement of subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance. Analysis of the preoperative and postoperative mean functional VAS score showed a significant improvement on both sides. Conclusion This prospective statistical study confirms that SRT significantly improved patient quality of life regarding nose function and appearance. It is a reliable technique that can help deliver consistently good results in reduction rhinoplasty in Caucasian patients with dorsal hump seeking rhinoplasty. Level of Evidence 2 Laryngoscope, 129:2702–2706, 2019

show abstract

“…This result suggests that the surgeon should be aware of both the functional and the aesthetic issues associated with RP. The follow-up period varies widely among studies in the literature (1,2,(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). Izu et al (2) attributed the differences in ROE scores between postoperative day 15 and the third postoperative month to a decrease in postoperative edema at the later time point.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most studies of RP have focused on the surgical technique, level of surgeon experience, development of complications, and revision rate (2,3) However, an assessment of RP from the patient's perspective, in terms of satisfaction and quality of life, is equally important because these are the predominant factors indicating the success of RP, as well as its ultimate purpose (4,5). Patient satisfaction with the results of RP is generally lower than with those of other facial aesthetic surgeries (6,7). Among the factors determining patient satisfaction with the RP outcome are the social environment, level of education, life experience, and expectations; the patient's expectations may not be realistic and may differ markedly from those of the surgeon (8).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Turkish Version of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation Questionnaire: Validation and Clinical Application

Çelik¹,

Altıntaş²

2018

Balkan Med J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: An assessment of rhinoplasty from the patient's perspective, in terms of satisfaction and quality of life, is quite important because these are the predominant factors indicating the success of rhinoplasty. Aims: To translate the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation into Turkish and then validate the new version for use in Turkish patients. Study Design: Validation study. Methods: We enrolled 30 participants who were able to read and write Turkish and underwent primary rhinoplasty. The control group consisted of 58 healthy volunteers with no need for aesthetic or functional nasal surgery. The reliability of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T was analyzed according to its internal consistency and test-retest reproducibility. Discriminant validity was calculated by comparing the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T scores between the patient and control groups. Responsiveness and sensitivity to changes in rhinoplasty outcomes were analyzed by comparing the patients' pre-and postoperative Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T scores. Results: The scores for questions 1-6 of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T, as well as the total scores, were significantly lower in the patient group than in the control group (all p<0.05). In the patient group, the scores for questions 1-6 of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T, as well as the total scores, were higher postoperatively than preoperatively (all p<0.05). The scores for each Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T question, as well as the total scores, did not differ significantly with respect to test-retest reproducibility (all p>0.05). The internal consistency of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T was high, as evidenced by Cronbach's α values of 0.887 preoperatively and 0.798 postoperatively. Conclusion: The Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation-T constitutes a validated instrument with which to measure rhinoplasty outcomes among Turkish patients.

show abstract

Evaluation of aesthetic and functional outcomes in rhinoplasty surgery: a prospective study

Abstract: We found that patients with lower literacy degree were more satisfied with the procedure. Rhinoplasty surgery significantly improved patient quality of life regarding nose function and appearance.

Cited by 44 publications

References 14 publications

Comparison of the efficacy of the use of an osteotome versus concave saw blade in lateral osteotomy during septorhinoplasty surgeries

Comparison of the efficacy of the use of an osteotome versus concave saw blade in lateral osteotomy during septorhinoplasty surgeries

Spare roof technique in reduction rhinoplasty: Prospective study of the first one hundred patients

The Turkish Version of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation Questionnaire: Validation and Clinical Application

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About