2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeated fine-needle aspiration cytology for the diagnosis and follow-up of thyroid nodules

Abstract: Repeat FNA is a valuable procedure in cases with initial non-diagnostic or A/FLUS cytology, but its routine use for patients with an initial benign examination appears to not increase the expected likelihood of a malignant finding.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this group of patients, the clinical management would have changed to a more conservative one not warranting surgery, had they not had a high MTNS score. The proportion of cases in our study that downgraded to a benign score of B2 after r-USFNA are not consistent with those reported in the literature however, ranging from 42.3 to 78.4 % of cases (average 60.3 %) [ 6 , 16 18 , 20 , 21 ]. The reason for this discrepancy could be attributed to the very small number of samples in our study that had a repeat USFNA score of B2.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…In this group of patients, the clinical management would have changed to a more conservative one not warranting surgery, had they not had a high MTNS score. The proportion of cases in our study that downgraded to a benign score of B2 after r-USFNA are not consistent with those reported in the literature however, ranging from 42.3 to 78.4 % of cases (average 60.3 %) [ 6 , 16 18 , 20 , 21 ]. The reason for this discrepancy could be attributed to the very small number of samples in our study that had a repeat USFNA score of B2.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…This is in accordance with the study by Afroze et al, 17 wherein papillary carcinoma was the most common thyroid tumor reported on final histopathology. 21,22 A study by Roy et al 23 showed that the sensitivity of FNAC was 81.5% and specificity of FNAC was 95.3% in their evaluation of thyroid nodules. 23 Sengupta et al, 24 had a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 100%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repeat FNAC is the usual method of management after indeterminate diagnosis because the expected risk of malignancy is far more than 5% according to Koh J et al .’s study 39 . Repeat FNAC appears to not increase the expected likelihood of a malignant finding for patients who have an initial benign reading according to Graciano AJ et al .’s research 40 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%