2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of IPACK combined with adductor canal block under ultrasound guidance on early motor function after total knee arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies suggest that the adductor canal block and infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) offer safe and effective pain management following TKA. [ 13 , 14 ] However, the safety of these PNBs, which involve drug administration without direct peripheral nerve visualization, is not assured in patients with CIDP. Notably, one study documented delayed foot drop due to the spread of the local anesthetic agent in adductor canal block and IPACK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies suggest that the adductor canal block and infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) offer safe and effective pain management following TKA. [ 13 , 14 ] However, the safety of these PNBs, which involve drug administration without direct peripheral nerve visualization, is not assured in patients with CIDP. Notably, one study documented delayed foot drop due to the spread of the local anesthetic agent in adductor canal block and IPACK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new ultrasound-guided technique has been devised that comprises infiltration of the local anesthetic between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee and provides effective analgesia to the posterior aspect of the knee without affecting muscle strength ( 25 ). Combining ACB with IPACK block provides adequate analgesia to the anterior and posterior aspects of the knee without affecting muscle strength ( 5 , 6 , 26 ). In the meta-analysis, Hussain et al reported that in the absence of LIA, adding IPACK to ACB reduces pain for up to 24 h, enhances functional recovery, and does not support the addition of IPACK to ACB when LIA is routinely administered ( 27 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salman et al [8] compared the FNB, FNB + IPACK, and ACB + IPACK groups and found better physiotherapy performance in the ACB + IPACK group. Zheng et al [24] compared the ACB + IPACK, and FNB + single-injection popliteal sciatic nerve block (SPSNB) groups and found better quadriceps femoris muscle strength scores in the ACB + IPACK group. Similarly, Reddy et al [25] showed that the ambulation rate was better in combinations that included IPACK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%