2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of anesthesia induction on cerebral tissue oxygen saturation in hypertensive patients: an observational study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following reasons may explain this result. First, hypertensive patients have impaired automatic blood pressure regulation and are more likely to develop hypotension after general anesthesia induction ( 17 ). Second, hypertensive patients have much lower venous compliance than those with normal blood pressure ( 18 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following reasons may explain this result. First, hypertensive patients have impaired automatic blood pressure regulation and are more likely to develop hypotension after general anesthesia induction ( 17 ). Second, hypertensive patients have much lower venous compliance than those with normal blood pressure ( 18 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the three hypotheses of CSI, the DeepFi system architecture includes an offline training phase and an online positioning phase [ 4 ]. At present, in the study of brain tissue oxygen saturation, Takadran et al aim to use near-infrared spectroscopy to evaluate the brain tissue oxygen saturation of hypertensive patients after anesthesia induction and to determine whether these patients have impaired brain tissue oxygen saturation [ 5 ]. Oxygen is necessary for the nutrition of living cells of the human body, and insufficient oxygen supply can damage human tissues, leading to hypoxia and loss of consciousness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results during LOC were reported by others. Park et al 16 reported that StO 2 increased by 5% to 6%, Taskaldiran et al reported an StO 2 increase of 4%, 98 Valencia et al 9% increase, 44 and Kim et al, 10% increase. 99 Conversely, an StO 2 decrease of 2% to 5% was reported by others, 100,101 which would lead to an increase in OEF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%