2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anesthesia in anti-N-methyl- d -aspartate receptor encephalitis – is general anesthesia a requisite? A case report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bu etki halüsinasyonların ortaya çıkışının olası mekanizmalarından biri olabilir (8,9). Bahsedilen reseptörün inhibisyonunun bellekte bozulmaya, görsel halüsinasyonlara ve şizofreni benzeri semptomlara sebep olduğu saptanmıştır (10).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Bu etki halüsinasyonların ortaya çıkışının olası mekanizmalarından biri olabilir (8,9). Bahsedilen reseptörün inhibisyonunun bellekte bozulmaya, görsel halüsinasyonlara ve şizofreni benzeri semptomlara sebep olduğu saptanmıştır (10).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Anti-NMDA encephalitis exclusively involves limbic regions and is characterized by psychotic behavioral changes, autonomic dysfunction, and movement disorders [1]. There is a paucity of literature on the anesthetic concerns in a case of autoimmune limbic encephalitis; many authors have recommended general anesthesia [2,3], and we could find only one case in which authors had given a transverse abdominis plane block [4]. Most general anesthetics, including the volatile anesthetics, act via the NMDA receptor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most general anesthetics, including the volatile anesthetics, act via the NMDA receptor. NMDA antagonists like ketamine, nitrous oxide, xenon, tramadol, methadone, and phencyclidine are avoided in this condition because their effects are unpredictable and may worsen the course of the disease [2][3][4]. Pascual-Ramírez et al have used a combination of propofol, sevoflurane, and fentanyl in a case with no complications [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%