Comparison of the conventional CMAC and the D-blade CMAC with the direct laryngoscopes in simulated cervical spine injury—a manikin study

Jain, Divya; Dhankar, Mandeep; Wig, Jai Dev; Jain, Amit

doi:10.1016/j.bjane.2013.06.005

Cited by 23 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Requirement of optimisation maneuvers (BURP or second assistant) was least in the C-MAC video laryngoscope group in a similar study during intubation with conventional Macintosh and McCoy blades when compared with C-MAC video laryngoscopes and C-MAC -D blades. 10 In the same study, time taken for successful intubation was much less with the direct laryngoscopy which was attributed to the familiarity of the participants to those conventional scopes than to the newer video laryngoscopes. 10 Similar study was undertaken which concluded that C-MAC required shorter intubation time and fewer intubation attempts when compared with McGrath video laryngoscopes in anticipated difficult airway patients.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

“…10 In the same study, time taken for successful intubation was much less with the direct laryngoscopy which was attributed to the familiarity of the participants to those conventional scopes than to the newer video laryngoscopes. 10 Similar study was undertaken which concluded that C-MAC required shorter intubation time and fewer intubation attempts when compared with McGrath video laryngoscopes in anticipated difficult airway patients. 1 A study comparing the time required for successful intubation with Airtraq laryngoscope (38±18secs) and KVL (26±11secs) proved KVL to be more efficient.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of laryngoscopy and intubating conditions using kings vision laryngoscope and C-MAC video laryngoscope

Shetty¹,

Vyshnavi²,

Dharanindra³

et al. 2020

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction and Aims: Currently wide arrays of video laryngoscopes are available to facilitate laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in routine and difficult airway patients, intensive care units (ICU) and emergency settings. This study is undertaken to compare the efficacy of C-MAC and King Vision video laryngoscope for easy laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in patients with no predictors of difficult airway. Materials and Methods: 60 adult patients undergoing elective surgery were randomly allocated into 2 groups for intubation using either King Vision laryngoscope (KVL group) or C-MAC video laryngoscope (C-MAC group). The parameters recorded were need for external laryngeal manipulation, percentage of glottis opening (POGO score), Cormack Lehane grading, number of attempts and time taken for successful endotracheal intubation and the airway morbidity. Systolic, diastolic, mean blood pressure and heart rate were measured preoperatively and at 1 and 2 min following endotracheal intubation in both the groups. The obtained data were analysed using chi-square test and Student's t-test using SPSS software Results: The use of Kings Vision laryngoscope or CMAC video laryngoscope did not differ significantly with respect to good laryngoscopy and intubating conditions. But airway morbidity was significantly lower in the KVL group (10%) when compared with the C-MAC group (40%) p<0.015. Rise in systolic blood pressure(SBP) at 1min following laryngoscopy was significantly less in KVL group(135.20±16.604) than in C-MAC group(142.00±10.055) p<0.042. Conclusions:The use of C-MAC or KVL provided excellent laryngoscopy and intubating conditions except for the airway morbidity and haemodynamic stability which were better with the use of KVL.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Comparison of laryngoscopy and intubating conditions using kings vision laryngoscope and C-MAC video laryngoscope

Shetty¹,

Vyshnavi²,

Dharanindra³

et al. 2020

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The 40º curvature of the blade D-Blade contrast with 18º of traditional McIntosh blade [8], favoring a more anterior location of the tip of the blade with an anterior displacement of the vallecula [22]. This creates a distension of the supra-glottis structures below the blade, visually separating the glottis and facilitating the differentiation, increasing the success rate.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…VL in patients with cervical pathology can match or exceed the success rate of direct laryngoscopy, using comparable times and possibly reducing extension of the CS [8]. The …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Radiological Assessment Of Cervical Spine Mobility Comparing Direct Laryngoscopy With Miller Blade And Video-Laryngoscopy With CMAC In Healthy Adults

Niño¹,

JJ²

2017

IJAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…New devices such as videolaryngoscopes present challenge in everyday work of anesthesiologist, especially in cases where diffi cult airway management may be expected [1][2][3][4][5][6] . Despite growing popularity of these devices, only few studies evaluating D-blade videolaryngoscope performance have been conducted to date [7][8][9][10][11][12] . Th e aim of this study was to compare C-MAC D-blade with Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of glottis view, time to intubation, intubation diffi culty score (IDS) and hemodynamic stability in patients with normal airway scheduled for elective surgical procedure.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Cormack Lehane Grading System and Intubation Difficulty Score in Patients Intubated by D-Blade Video and Direct Macintosh Laryngoscope: A Randomized Controlled Study

Pažur¹,

Maldini

Hostić³

et al. 2016

acc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARY -D-blade is a relatively new device in the fi eld of videolaryngoscopy, designed for airway management by enabling indirectoscopic glottic view. In our study, we investigated effi ciency of D-blade in comparison with direct Macintosh laryngoscope (gold standard). Fifty-two adult patients with normal airway scheduled for elective surgery in general anesthesia were randomly assigned in D-blade video or direct Macintosh group. In the fi rst video group, patients were laryngoscoped and intubated by D-blade, and in the second group laryngoscopy and intubation were performed by Macintosh laryngoscope. Glottic view was evaluated according to Cormack Lehane grading system (C-L), while duration of intubation and easiness of intubation were evaluated according to the intubation diffi culty score (IDS). Additionally, hemodynamic parameters were recorded before and after induction. Th ere were no statistically signifi cant between-group diff erences in time to intubation, easiness of endotracheal tube insertion, C-L, and IDS. In comparison with direct Macintosh laryngoscope, D-blade showed similar but still favorable characteristics. In our opinion, D-blade is a useful device in airway management and should be used in daily anesthesiologist work.

show abstract

Comparison of the conventional CMAC and the D-blade CMAC with the direct laryngoscopes in simulated cervical spine injury—a manikin study

Abstract: The overall performance of the conventional CMAC blade proved to be the best when compared with the D-blade CMAC, Macintosh blade and the McCoy blade for intubation in simulated cervical spine patients by anesthesia residents.

Cited by 23 publications

References 25 publications

Comparison of laryngoscopy and intubating conditions using kings vision laryngoscope and C-MAC video laryngoscope

Comparison of laryngoscopy and intubating conditions using kings vision laryngoscope and C-MAC video laryngoscope

Radiological Assessment Of Cervical Spine Mobility Comparing Direct Laryngoscopy With Miller Blade And Video-Laryngoscopy With CMAC In Healthy Adults

Comparison of Cormack Lehane Grading System and Intubation Difficulty Score in Patients Intubated by D-Blade Video and Direct Macintosh Laryngoscope: A Randomized Controlled Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About