1991
DOI: 10.1016/0961-9526(91)90015-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical performance of ultra-high-strength polyethylene fibers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2628 It has been reported by many investigations that the tensile properties (especially strength) of various fibres and yarns are dependent on the tested gauge lengths. 14,19,2936 The effect of gauge length arises from the distribution of critical flaws in some periodic fashion along the fibre length direction. The probability that large flaws exist is higher in longer fibres, which leads to a decrease in strength with increasing fibre length.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2628 It has been reported by many investigations that the tensile properties (especially strength) of various fibres and yarns are dependent on the tested gauge lengths. 14,19,2936 The effect of gauge length arises from the distribution of critical flaws in some periodic fashion along the fibre length direction. The probability that large flaws exist is higher in longer fibres, which leads to a decrease in strength with increasing fibre length.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15-24 Gas mixtures containing oxygen, ~-2~ ammonia 22 or polymer-forming plasmas 23 have been used. Plasma treatments containing oxygen resulted in improved flexural properties, ~5'~7'~9 pull-out strength 16"2°' [22][23][24] and ILSS values up to 30 to 34MPaJ5 ~7,2~ Improvements in bond strength were attributed to enhanced wettability, mechanical interlocking and chemical bonding. The effect of plasma treatments on the reduction in tensile strength was generally fairly small (less than 10%).…”
Section: Fibre/matrix Adhesionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…15 ' 17"23"24 Besides corona and plasma treatments, also chemical etching has been used. 24 '25 Recently, showed that regardless of the type of treatment, being either chemical etching, corona or plasma, the introduction of functional groups, rather than wettability and mechanical interlocking, is the predominant factor in improving the adhesion between ultradrawn PE and epoxy matrices. By monitoring the changes in surface topography using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and surface composition (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) the improvement in pull-out strength could be related to the introduction of functional oxygen-containing groups, i.e.…”
Section: Fibre/matrix Adhesionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fourfold improvement in τ for the OMS, fluorescent silane, and SiO 2 treatments can be compared with previous microbond shear strength tests using high‐modulus UHMWPE fibers and epoxy resin beads. In the case of chemically etched (using aqua regia) Spectra 900™ fibers, τ increased 1.4 fold without significant decreases in the fiber strength 5. For chemically (chromic acid) or plasma‐etched UHMWPE fibers of different draw ratios, τ increased three‐ to fourfold for the chromic acid etchant and four‐ to tenfold for the plasma treatment 6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested3 that physicochemical interactions, mechanical interlocking, and chemical interactions or bonding affect adhesive strength. Both chemical4, 5 and plasma‐etching treatments6, 7 have been used to improve UHMWPE/resin matrix interfacial adhesion 8. The degree of adhesion enhancement is determined by the power of and the particular surface changes introduced by the etchant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%