2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4471-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing cancer pain management in resource-limited settings

Abstract: Purpose Adequate cancer pain management (CPM) is challenging in resource-limited settings, where current international guideline recommendations are difficult to implement owing to constraints such as inadequate availability and accessibility of opioids, limited awareness of appropriate opioid use among patients and clinicians, and lack of guidance on how to translate the best evidence into clinical practice. The multinational and multidisciplinary CAncer Pain managEment in Resource-limited settin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The visual analogue scale (VAS) was nine (7-10) and standardized to 10; eight patients (80%) responded. The average VAS at the time of response was three (range: [1][2][3][4][5][6], and the average time to response was 2.8 days (range: 2-5). In the first week, 40% of the patients categorized the result as 'excellent', 30% deemed the result 'good', and 20% reported the result as 'poor'.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The visual analogue scale (VAS) was nine (7-10) and standardized to 10; eight patients (80%) responded. The average VAS at the time of response was three (range: [1][2][3][4][5][6], and the average time to response was 2.8 days (range: 2-5). In the first week, 40% of the patients categorized the result as 'excellent', 30% deemed the result 'good', and 20% reported the result as 'poor'.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refractory pain in cancer patients during their terminal phase is surely underrated worldwide but especially so in geographical settings with limited resources [4][5]. At best, where more efficient health and palliative care is available, patients are mainly managed by opiates that produce sedative states [1] or incur other well-known side effects [21] without necessarily producing an optimal pain control in some patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Associate Professor Strasser emphasized a multimodal pain management 58 in cancer with pharmacologic interventions 59,60 and a behavioural approach 52 . An early prophylactic management of secondary as well as nutrition‐impact symptoms should also be taken in consideration, 61 as pharmacological side effects like opioid‐induced constipation and nausea can worsen the nutritional status in the affected patients. In this context, Associate Professor Strasser highlighted that an adequate pain management may improve appetite, physical function, quality of life, and medical adherence in cachectic patients with advanced cancer 62,63 …”
Section: Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] Research results according to Rosa (2017) shows data that as we get older the higher the BPH incidence rate, this is the same as the events in Indonesia where 50% of BPH events are experienced by men aged 60-70 years and 80% experienced by men aged 80 years. [2] Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience resulting from actual or potential tissue damage [3] There are various kinds of pain experienced by patients in the hospital and most of the causes of patient pain are caused by surgery or surgery, including acute pain and can hinder the patient's healing process because it inhibits the patient's ability to be actively involved in the healing process and increases the risk of complications due to immobilization so rehabilitation can be delayed and [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%