1998
DOI: 10.1007/s002210050564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal ranges of central nervous processing: clinical evidence

Abstract: The organization of the time frames for perceiving, generating, and updating information in the CNS has as of yet received little attention despite its elementary character for human behavior. We investigated temporal epochs in perceiving, acting, and updating in patients with anterior and posterior lesions of the left and right hemisphere, in patients with lesions in the left hemisphere without aphasia, and in healthy controls. Three temporal ranges, 30, 300, and 3000 ms, were assessed with different psychoph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several recent neuroimaging studies have confirmed this proposition by demonstrating a preferential engagement of the left auditory cortex in the processing of rapidly changing acoustic information (Zatorre and Belin 2001;Zaehle et al 2004;Jamison et al 2006;Schonwiesner et al 2005;Zaehle et al 2008), whereas the processing of slowly changing acoustic information specifically recruits the right auditory cortex (Belin et al 1998;Boemio et al 2005;Jamison et al 2006;Schonwiesner et al 2005;Meyer et al 2002). The gist of these studies is consistent with clinical investigations in which aphasic patients with lesions affecting the left auditory cortex have shown impaired processing of temporally relevant acoustic (nonspeech) information (Efron 1963;Von Steinbuchel 1998). In contrast, patients with lesions of the right Heschl gyrus show impairments in the processing of spectrally relevant acoustic (nonspeech) information (Zatorre 1988;Johnsrude et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Several recent neuroimaging studies have confirmed this proposition by demonstrating a preferential engagement of the left auditory cortex in the processing of rapidly changing acoustic information (Zatorre and Belin 2001;Zaehle et al 2004;Jamison et al 2006;Schonwiesner et al 2005;Zaehle et al 2008), whereas the processing of slowly changing acoustic information specifically recruits the right auditory cortex (Belin et al 1998;Boemio et al 2005;Jamison et al 2006;Schonwiesner et al 2005;Meyer et al 2002). The gist of these studies is consistent with clinical investigations in which aphasic patients with lesions affecting the left auditory cortex have shown impaired processing of temporally relevant acoustic (nonspeech) information (Efron 1963;Von Steinbuchel 1998). In contrast, patients with lesions of the right Heschl gyrus show impairments in the processing of spectrally relevant acoustic (nonspeech) information (Zatorre 1988;Johnsrude et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Such phenomenon is more likely to occur in systems with memory than without memory. Similar arguments could be extended to studies which found that lesions of right precentral cortex seem to prolong Necker cube switching time (Steinbuchel 1998), lesions of right parietal cortex prolong binocular rivalry switching times (Pavlovskaya et al 2001), as well as that binocular rivalry switching times are also unusually long in some psychiatric illnesses (schizophrenia and bipolar disorder) (Pettigrew and Miller 1998). (2) Leopold et al (2003) have also shown that band-limited power (BLP) of local field potential (LFP) displayed fluctuations at many time scales.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Low-dimensional chaos is usually a consequence of nonlinear interactions among a few modes in a deterministic system. In principle, it is unlikely to be consistent with single unit neural recording and functional imaging studies, which implicate multiple cortical areas in visual multistability (Elbert et al 1985;Inui et al 2000;Kleinschmidt et al 1998;Lumer et al 1998;Tong et al 1998;Sterzer et al 2002;Steinbuchel 1998;Bisiach et al 1999). This is because it is highly unlikely that the multiple cortical areas involved in visual multistability may be described by only a few variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…1b and c). Recent electrophysiological and functional imaging studies reveal important clues to the origins of visual multistability during binocular rivalry in striate, extrastriate, parietal, temporal, and possibly even frontal cortex (Elbert et al 1985;Lumer et al 1998;von Steinbu¨chel 1998;Tong et al 1998;Inui et al 2000;Sengpeil 2000;Leopold et al 2002;Sterzer et al 2002;White et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%