2006
DOI: 10.1007/bf03192389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infeasible paths in the context of data flow based testing criteria: Identification, classification and prediction

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…8 supports the belief that the sample used in the experiment has a representative behaviour with the independent sets used in the previous studies such as in [14]. These results are also verified by Vergilio et al [56] study. In their study the authors repeated an experiment involving the number of predicates and feasibility, and they concluded the same findings.…”
Section: Threats To Validitysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…8 supports the belief that the sample used in the experiment has a representative behaviour with the independent sets used in the previous studies such as in [14]. These results are also verified by Vergilio et al [56] study. In their study the authors repeated an experiment involving the number of predicates and feasibility, and they concluded the same findings.…”
Section: Threats To Validitysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Selecting input values to create good test cases that are likely to reveal faults is a fundamental challenge in this field. However, testing a software with all possible input values is, in general, impossible [Vergilio et al 2006].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These rules are quite efficient as they solely based on syntax analysis. Later Vergilio et al [164] showed that, by a fast scan, Hedley and Hennell's rules were able to identify nearly half paths as infeasible in a path set with 880 sample paths.…”
Section: Syntax-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They stated "the number of predicates involved in a path being a good heuristic for assessing a path's feasibility". The greater the number of predicates exist in a path, the greater the probability for the path being The advantage of such metrics is that they are easy to implement and provide a fast way to predict path infeasibility within a confidence level [164]. However, it is an approach of rough estimation rather than accurate detection.…”
Section: Infeasibility Estimation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%