Dietary Phytochemicals and Microbes 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-3926-0_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview of Antimicrobial Properties of Different Classes of Phytochemicals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
2
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, increased genus (Prevotella, RC9_gut_group, Succinivibrio and Ruminobacter) by daidzein all belonged to Gram-negative bacteria (Fonty and Chaucheyras-Durand 2006), while repressed genus Ruminococcaceae_uncultured and Lachnospiraceae_ unclassified belonged to Gram-positive bacteria (Clarke et al 2013). These results are consistent with previous studies in which Gram-positive bacteria are more sensitive to polyphenols than Gram-negative bacteria, due to the differences found in their wall composition (Puupponen-Pimi€ a et al 2005;Patra 2012). In addition, while these Gram-positive bacteria groups were inhibited, others maybe thrived in the available niche of the ecosystem (Cardona et al 2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the present study, increased genus (Prevotella, RC9_gut_group, Succinivibrio and Ruminobacter) by daidzein all belonged to Gram-negative bacteria (Fonty and Chaucheyras-Durand 2006), while repressed genus Ruminococcaceae_uncultured and Lachnospiraceae_ unclassified belonged to Gram-positive bacteria (Clarke et al 2013). These results are consistent with previous studies in which Gram-positive bacteria are more sensitive to polyphenols than Gram-negative bacteria, due to the differences found in their wall composition (Puupponen-Pimi€ a et al 2005;Patra 2012). In addition, while these Gram-positive bacteria groups were inhibited, others maybe thrived in the available niche of the ecosystem (Cardona et al 2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Several subgroups of flavonoids have been found in higher plants. Flavonols [most abundant flavonoids in foods, including quercetin ( 48 ), kaempferol ( 55 ), and myricetin ( 46 )], flavanones [found in citrus fruits such as naringin ( 77 )], flavones [e.g., luteolin ( 20 ) in celery], and chalcones [licochalcone A ( 122 ), licochalcone E ( 123 )] as well as catechins in green and black teas, anthocyanin in strawberries and other berries and isoflavonoids [with ring C in position 3 instead of position 2], such as sophoraisoflavone A ( 94 ) found in legumes (Patra, ), are only few examples.…”
Section: Flavonoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another notable strength is the use of a representative sample of the Australian population, as well as the validated method (MSM) of calculating usual nutrient intake from repeated 24-h dietary recalls (34) . Some of the limitations of the present study include the use of 24-h diet recall questionnaires in the NNPAS (1,2). The single 24-h diet recall has been considered insufficient because of the retrospective method of dietary assessment and an inability to describe the typical diet from a single day's intake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“… DR, dietary recall; F, female; GALEN, Global Allergy and Asthma European Network of Excellence; M, male; MSM, multiple source method; FFQ, food frequency questionnaire; WFR, weighted food record. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%