“…In particular, the J sub / J 0 parameter was shown to decrease progressively from xanthene ( J sub / J 0 =3.45±0.5; BDFE=67.9 kcal mol −1 ) to γ‐terpinene ( J sub / J 0 =2.4±0.7; BDFE=67.9–68.4 kcal mol −1 ) and to dihydroanthracene ( J sub / J 0 =1.4±0.6; BDFE=69.8), while flattening to values close to 1 for more challenging substrates, in line with the threshold limit given by the BDFE of 80.5±2.3 kcal mol −1 for the N−H bond in QNC (purple dashed vertical line in Figure 6B). [61] It is worth mentioning that the abstraction of a hydrogen atom bound to carbon is associated with slow kinetics and to significant activation energy when compared to a hydrogen atom bound to heteroatoms, [62,63] in particular when the C−H group is allylic or benzylic: [59] this might explain the low photoelectrochemical response with dihydroanthracene and fluorene, albeit characterized by C−H with BDFE being below the 80.5 Kcal mol −1 threshold. - No photoelectrochemical response ( J / J 0 ≈1) was observed in the presence of tert ‐butylbenzene and of dimethylxanthene, electron rich substrates but without reactive C−H benzylic/allylic moieties, supporting that a hydrogen abstraction mechanism is operating in the C−H activation, rather than a single electron oxidation of the substrate.
- In the case of γ‐terpinene and xanthene substrates, a low photoelectrochemical response ( J / J 0 in the range 1.2–1.4 and 1.0–1.2 for γ‐terpinene and xanthene, respectively) was observed with SnO 2 electrodes sensitized with a QNC−C16 derivative where nitrogen atoms are alkylated with −(CH 2 ) 15 CH 3 pendants, thus proving the key role of the N−H group in QNC to enable the C−H activation (Figures S17, S18).
- Oxidation of γ‐terpinene and xanthene substrates through a single electron transfer process involving the QNC dye is energetically unfavorable, on the basis of the redox potentials determined by cyclic voltammetry: anodic waves are observed at E >1.1 V and at E >0.95 V vs. Fc + /Fc for γ‐terpinene and xanthene, respectively, while the anodic peak potential of QNC in QNC|SnO 2 electrodes in acetonitrile is 0.75 V vs. Fc + /Fc (Figure S19).
…”