1995
DOI: 10.1002/9781118150504.ch17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Response to Business Mail Surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
6
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, our results cannot be generalised to the entire licensee population. The response rate was comparable to that achieved by others using similar methods for establishment surveys, including the developer of those methods 36 37. Varying response rates, such as by business type (multi-site corporation vs sole proprietorship), may have had multiple and offsetting effects on the data 22.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Nevertheless, our results cannot be generalised to the entire licensee population. The response rate was comparable to that achieved by others using similar methods for establishment surveys, including the developer of those methods 36 37. Varying response rates, such as by business type (multi-site corporation vs sole proprietorship), may have had multiple and offsetting effects on the data 22.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Following Dillman's tailored design method (Dillman 1978(Dillman , 2000, we initiated between two and six contacts by various modes with each firm, resulting 193 usable surveys and a 43% usable response rate. This is significantly higher than the 20% rate that is common for firm-level surveys (Paxson et al 1995).…”
Section: Fortunately Industry Associations Exist For Metal Stamping mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The response rate including the SOE and retail entrepreneurs was 20%. This was a low response rate, but this rate is typical of studies of small business owners (e.g., 21% found by Paxson, Dillman, and Tarnai, 1995). Despite the low response, the results of this study should be read in conjunction with Study 1 to appreciate how emotion influences risk perceptions and preferences.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 83%