1966
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1966.00970050778013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dexamethasone Ocular Hypertension in the Clinically Normal Eye

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors reported that none of the eyes showed an IOP ≥25 mm Hg or an increase in IOP by ≥10 mm Hg at 15 minutes, day 7, or month 4 after IDI injection; however, 8.6% of the eyes showed an IOP ≥25 mm Hg or an increase in IOP by ≥10 mm Hg at month 1 and 25% at month 2 (23). The IOP changes observed in our study population were similar to those reported by Armaly et al (22). An IOP of >31 mm Hg was reported to be 4% in the mentioned study (22), and in our study this rate was 2%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The authors reported that none of the eyes showed an IOP ≥25 mm Hg or an increase in IOP by ≥10 mm Hg at 15 minutes, day 7, or month 4 after IDI injection; however, 8.6% of the eyes showed an IOP ≥25 mm Hg or an increase in IOP by ≥10 mm Hg at month 1 and 25% at month 2 (23). The IOP changes observed in our study population were similar to those reported by Armaly et al (22). An IOP of >31 mm Hg was reported to be 4% in the mentioned study (22), and in our study this rate was 2%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The IOP changes observed in our study population were similar to those reported by Armaly et al (22). An IOP of >31 mm Hg was reported to be 4% in the mentioned study (22), and in our study this rate was 2%. Also in our series, 14% of eyes showed an increase in IOP of ≥10 mm Hg and only 2 of them (4%) needed chronic antiglaucoma medication.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current study, percutaneously absorbed corticosteroids appears to have had little effect on the eyes. However, care should be paid to steroid responders, as theroretically they may have a higher risk of increase in intraocular pressure caused by steroids 9 . This effect is more pronounced in children and young people, but the change is usually reversible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, subgroup analysis was performed according to 3 follow-up time frames (0-24, 0-48, and ≥49 months), age group, and sex. To exclude the use of corticosteroids as a potential confounder, a sensitivity analysis excluding corticosteroid users was performed, and to assess potential residual confounding such as frequent eye examinations in patients with RA, we also evaluated the risk of conjunctival and eyelid disorders during the follow-up period as negative control outcomes (eAppendix in the Supplement). A 2–sided P < .05 was considered significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%