2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2006.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

10 Years after the crisis: Thailand's financial system reform

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is, however, not so surprising as these two countries differ on the level of financial depth, credit outreach and the number of credit programs introduced in rural areas. While the Vietnamese government began to introduce and support formal financial intermediaries in rural areas such as Vietnam Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (VBARD) and Vietnam Bank for Social Policy (VBSP) around the early 1990s (Dufhues et al, 2004), the Thai government introduced such financial institutions as early as mid-1970s by supporting homegrown non-bank financial institutions and promoting the Bank for Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives (BAAC) into rural development bank Suwanaporn, 2007 andRungruxsirivorn, 2009). The institutions introduced by Thai government have enhanced access to financial services particularly for households in the non-municipal areas of Thailand.…”
Section: Over-indebtednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is, however, not so surprising as these two countries differ on the level of financial depth, credit outreach and the number of credit programs introduced in rural areas. While the Vietnamese government began to introduce and support formal financial intermediaries in rural areas such as Vietnam Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (VBARD) and Vietnam Bank for Social Policy (VBSP) around the early 1990s (Dufhues et al, 2004), the Thai government introduced such financial institutions as early as mid-1970s by supporting homegrown non-bank financial institutions and promoting the Bank for Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives (BAAC) into rural development bank Suwanaporn, 2007 andRungruxsirivorn, 2009). The institutions introduced by Thai government have enhanced access to financial services particularly for households in the non-municipal areas of Thailand.…”
Section: Over-indebtednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The financial reforms have been implemented mainly by the urgent needs of crisis resolution and force the economy back to normal performance situation. High growth and emerging economy of Thailand is driven by the high growth of financial sector (Menkhoff and Suwanaporn, 2007). However, the fragile, unwell planned development and inappropriate functioning of financial sector accelerate the attack of financial crisis began in July 1997.…”
Section: Thailand's Recent Economic and Trade Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Il montre qu ' une forte concentration des banques améliore les flux d ' informations et favorise l ' accès au crédit pour ces entreprises. D ' autres travaux ont également trouvé l ' existence d ' un lien positif entre la concurrence bancaire et le coût du crédit en Europe : Ziane (2003) en France, Hernández-Canovas etMartínez-Solano (2006) en Espagne,Degryse et Ongena (2007) en Belgique, etc Menkhoff et Suwanaporn (2007) et Shikimi (2013. aboutissent aux mêmes résultats en Thaïlande et au Japon respectivement.…”
unclassified