10‐Year Survival and Success Rates of 511 Titanium Implants with a Sandblasted and Acid‐Etched Surface: A Retrospective Study in 303 Partially Edentulous Patients

Buser, Daniel; Janner, Simone; Wittneben, Julia‐Gabriela; Brägger, Urs; Ramseier, Christoph A.; Salvi, Giovanni E.

doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00456.x

Cited by 505 publications

(490 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

409

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…(2017) performed a systematic review including papers with above 5‐year follow‐up yielding a 97.3% weighted implant survival rate. Numerous clinical studies with a 10‐year follow‐up yield survival rates of over 95% (Buser et al., 2012; Degidi, Nardi & Piattelli, 2012; Fischer & Stenberg, 2012; Gotfredsen, 2012; Jemt, 2017). For single tooth replacements on turned implants, cumulative survival rates of 96.8% after 17–19 years (Bergenblock, Andersson, Furst & Jemt, 2012) and 91.5% after 16–22 years (Dierens, Vandeweghe, Kisch, Nilner & De Bruyn, 2012) were reported.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How do peri‐implant biologic parameters correspond with implant survival and peri‐implantitis? A critical review

Doornewaard

Jacquet

Cosyn

et al. 2018

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesThe aim of this critical review was to evaluate whether commonly used biologic diagnostic parameters correspond to implant survival and peri‐implantitis prevalence.Materials and methodsPublications from 2011 to 2017 were selected by an electronic search using the Pubmed database of the US National Library of Medicine. Prospective and retrospective studies with a mean follow‐up time of at least 5 years and reporting prevalence of peri‐implantitis as well as mean bone loss and standard deviation were selected. The correlation between reported prevalence of peri‐implantitis and reported implant survival, mean follow‐up time, mean bone loss, mean probing depth, and mean bleeding on probing was calculated. Mean bone loss and standard deviation were used for estimation of proportion of implants with bone loss exceeding 1, 2, and 3 mm.ResultsFull‐text analysis was performed for 255 papers from 4,173 available ones, and 41 met all the inclusion criteria. The overall mean weighted survival rate was 96.9% (89.9%–100%) and the reported prevalence of peri‐implantitis ranged between 0% and 39.7%, based on 15 different case definitions. The overall weighted bone loss was 1.1 mm based on 8,182 implants and an average mean loading time ranging from 5 to 20 years. No correlation was found between mean bone loss and the reported prevalence of peri‐implantitis. The estimated prevalence of implants with bone loss above 2 mm was 23%. The overall weighted mean probing depth was 3.3 mm, and mean weighted bleeding was 52.2%. Only a weak correlation was found between survival and function time (r = −0.49). There was no relation between the probing depth or bleeding and the mean bone loss, mean follow‐up time, and reported prevalence of peri‐implantitis.ConclusionBiologic parameters mean probing depth and mean bleeding on probing do not correlate with mean bone loss and this irrespective of follow‐up. Case definition for peri‐implantitis varied significantly between studies indicating that an unambiguous definition based on a specified threshold for bone loss is not agreed upon in the literature.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How do peri‐implant biologic parameters correspond with implant survival and peri‐implantitis? A critical review

Doornewaard

Jacquet

Cosyn

et al. 2018

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…After grinding and polishing, etching with an acid solution containing HF, HNO 3 and H 2 O with a volume percentage of 2:3:10 was conducted. A linear intercept method was used for measuring grain size in OM images.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although the success rate of titanium implants is very high [3], failures do happen due to various factors. Overloading and insufficient osseointergration are complications related with the implant material that demand solutions from materials science.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The influence of surface roughness and high pressure torsion on the growth of anodic titania nanotubes on pure titanium

Gao

Starink

2016

Applied Surface Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Anodic titanium dioxide nanotube (TNT) arrays have wide applications in photocatalytic, catalysis, electronics, solar cells and biomedical implants. When TNT coatings are combined with severe plastic deformation (SPD), metal processing techniques which efficiently improve the strength of metals, a new generation of biomedical implant is made possible with both improved bulk and surface properties. This work investigated the effect of processing by high pressure torsion (HPT) and different mechanical preparations on the substrate and subsequently on the morphology of TNT layers. HPT processing was applied to refine the grain size of commercially pure titanium samples and substantially improved their strength and hardness. Subsequent anodization at 30 V in 0.25 wt. % NH 4 F for 2 hours to form TNT layers on sample surfaces prepared with different mechanical preparation methods was carried out. It appeared that the local roughness of the titanium surface on a microscopic level affected the TNT morphology more than the macroscopic surface roughness. For HPTprocessed sample, the substrate has to be pre-treated by a mechanical preparation finer than 4000 grit for HPT to have a significant influence on TNTs. During the formation of TNT layers the oxide dissolution rate was increased for the ultrafine-grained microstructure formed due to HPT processing.

show abstract

“…Peri-implantitis has been reported to occur in the range of 1, 4 to 53.5% (Buser et al, 2012;Fardal and Grytten, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ten Years Follow-up after Dental Implant Therapy in Patient with a Chronic Periodontitis: A Case Report

Peeva-Petreska¹,

Daniela²,

Ivanovski³

2016

ijccr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Periodontal disease is characterized by progressive destruction of the periodontium, the alveolar bone and it is regarded as a leading cause of tooth loss in the adult population. These patients represent a unique group of potential candidates for dental implant therapy. A major consideration for the clinician is to determinate the influence of the disease on the placement and survival of implants, because according to the literature, patients with a history of periodontal disease, manifested significantly greater peri-implant marginal bone loss with a higher incidence of peri-implantitis and shorter longevity compared with periodontally healthy patients. The objective of the present case study is to demonstrate the multidisciplinary treatment approach in a patient with a severe chronic periodontitis and the outcome of implant therapy after 10 years follow-up. The authors present a case of 53 years old women with chronic inflammatory periodontitis but stable periodontal status, due to effective anti-infective therapy.The operative phase included extraction of the hopeless teeth with immediate dental implant placement and immediate placement of provisional. The reevaluation demonstrated good control of the gingival inflammation and stable periodontal status of the remaining theeth.The subsequent implant and prosthetic treatment led to the restoration of a functional dentition without any periimplant mucositis or periimplant bone loss after 10 years follow-up. The conclusion The long term success of the treatment of the complex cases with severe chronic periodontitis depends significantly upon the proper control of the periodontal infection and the achievement of a stable periodontal status of the residual dentition.With xcellent functional and aesthetic results, without any periimplant mucositis or periimplant bone loss after 10 years follow-up.

show abstract

10‐Year Survival and Success Rates of 511 Titanium Implants with a Sandblasted and Acid‐Etched Surface: A Retrospective Study in 303 Partially Edentulous Patients

Abstract: The present retrospective analysis resulted in a 10-year implant survival rate of 98.8% and a success rate of 97.0%. In addition, the prevalence of peri-implantitis in this large cohort of orally healthy patients was low with 1.8% during the 10-year period.

Cited by 505 publications

References 45 publications

How do peri‐implant biologic parameters correspond with implant survival and peri‐implantitis? A critical review

How do peri‐implant biologic parameters correspond with implant survival and peri‐implantitis? A critical review

The influence of surface roughness and high pressure torsion on the growth of anodic titania nanotubes on pure titanium

Ten Years Follow-up after Dental Implant Therapy in Patient with a Chronic Periodontitis: A Case Report

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About