Analogy in Grammar 2009
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547548.003.0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

10 Words and paradigms bit by bit: An information‐theoretic approach to the processing of inflection and derivation

Abstract: This chapter models the role of paradigm structure in lexical processing using cross-entropy measure. New experimental data demonstrates the usefulness of entropy, relative entropy, and cross entropy in modeling analogical generalizations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
52
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 199 publications
7
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Lukatela et al, 1978;Lukatela, Gligorijević, Kostić, & Turvey, 1980;Kostić & Katz, 1987). One possible interpretation is that it mirrors the difference in number of syntactic functions and meanings of Serbian noun cases, where nominative has only three functions/meanings, as compared to a magnitude larger number for the other (oblique) cases used in this study (more about the role of syntactic functions and meanings in Serbian in Kostić, Marković, & Baucal, 2003; also, syntactic functions and meanings are further discussed in the framework of information theory by Milin, Kuperman, Kostić, & Baayen, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Lukatela et al, 1978;Lukatela, Gligorijević, Kostić, & Turvey, 1980;Kostić & Katz, 1987). One possible interpretation is that it mirrors the difference in number of syntactic functions and meanings of Serbian noun cases, where nominative has only three functions/meanings, as compared to a magnitude larger number for the other (oblique) cases used in this study (more about the role of syntactic functions and meanings in Serbian in Kostić, Marković, & Baucal, 2003; also, syntactic functions and meanings are further discussed in the framework of information theory by Milin, Kuperman, Kostić, & Baayen, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Information theory can further help to understand the complexities involved when building words from the smallest meaningful units, i.e., morphemes [29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research emphasizes the role of patterns of language use and language change in the development of cross-linguistic regularities, rather than placing the burden of explanation on synchronic cognitive factors such as an innate Universal Grammar (Evans & Levinson 2009). This systems approach to language (see also Ramscar & Yarlett 2007, Milin et al 2009 in press, among others) links linguistic study to larger trends in the biological and social sciences (e.g., Epstein 2006, Miller & Page 2007, Capra & Luisi 2014.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%