1950
DOI: 10.1080/19447025008659846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

10—wool Fibre Diameter Uniformity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1951
1951
1951
1951

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…long, the authors have reached the following conclusions: &dquo; ( 1 ) fibre breaking load per unit cross-section increased with fibre diameter; (2) fibre breaking load was positively correlated (for fixed diameter) with fibre breaking extension; (3) there was a small positive correlation between fibre breaking extension and fibre diameter; and (4) the percentage coefficient of variation of fibre diameter within 1.5 cm. lengths was 10.3 :t: 4.25.&dquo; Length and fineness measurements and testing procedures have been reported [267,279, 288, 295,305 ] , as well as the presence and effects on processing of non-kempy medullated fibers of Australian wool [275]. Lang [276] has reviewed methods of testing raw wool and has discussed various techniques for determining moisture content, yield, fineness, and fiber length of raw-wool lots.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…long, the authors have reached the following conclusions: &dquo; ( 1 ) fibre breaking load per unit cross-section increased with fibre diameter; (2) fibre breaking load was positively correlated (for fixed diameter) with fibre breaking extension; (3) there was a small positive correlation between fibre breaking extension and fibre diameter; and (4) the percentage coefficient of variation of fibre diameter within 1.5 cm. lengths was 10.3 :t: 4.25.&dquo; Length and fineness measurements and testing procedures have been reported [267,279, 288, 295,305 ] , as well as the presence and effects on processing of non-kempy medullated fibers of Australian wool [275]. Lang [276] has reviewed methods of testing raw wool and has discussed various techniques for determining moisture content, yield, fineness, and fiber length of raw-wool lots.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%