10-O-03 - Insertion compounds of metal halides with porosils: “Structured Gases”

Behrens, Peter; Hartl, Monika; Wirnsberger, Gernot; Popitsch, Alois; Pillep, B.

doi:10.1016/s0167-2991(01)81203-9

Cited by 1 publication

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The concept of using the well‐defined, three‐dimensional regularly arranged pore systems of crystalline microporous SiO 2 frameworks as templates for the arrangement of guest molecules offers a new synthetic route to host–guest compounds with very weak host–guest interactions and strongly reduced guest–guest interactions 12–17. By choosing the appropriate pore systems (from among the ca.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We have previously shown12–17 that by the use of microporous silica modifications (so‐called porosils)18 instead of zeolites this problem can be eliminated. For example, the properties of iodine insertion compounds in various porosils are mainly determined by guest–guest interactions, which are in turn restricted by the available space in the porous host frameworks.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, the properties of iodine insertion compounds in various porosils are mainly determined by guest–guest interactions, which are in turn restricted by the available space in the porous host frameworks. Due to the electroneutrality (no charge‐compensating cations necessary) and chemical inertness of the SiO 2 host, host–guest interactions are reduced to weak van der Waals forces 12–17…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Here, we report the modular assembly of new host–guest compounds using porosils as rigid and inert host matrices and mercury( II ) halides as the guest components 17. Various porosils have been used, spanning the full range of pore dimensionalities from zero‐ to three‐dimensional.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Probing the Limit of Weak Host–Guest Interactions: Insertion Compounds of Mercury(II) Halides with Microporous SiO2 Hosts

et al. 2002

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mercury(II) halides HgX2 (X=Cl, Br, I) were inserted into the voids of the crystalline microporous SiO2 modifications deca‐dodecasil 3R (short term: DDR), silica‐theta‐1 (TON), silica‐ferrierite (FER) and silicalite‐1 (MFI) by vapour phase loading. The properties of the occluded guest species were studied by X‐ray absorption spectroscopy (X‐ray absorption near‐edge structure (XANES) and extended X‐ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) analysis), UV/Vis spectroscopy, and IR and Raman spectroscopy. The methods reveal the presence of HgX2 molecules in the insertion compounds. The interactions between these electroneutral guest molecules and the electroneutral surrounding SiO2 framework are weak. In addition, no indication of any significant guest–guest interaction between the embedded molecules was found, in contrast to the analogous iodine insertion compounds, where these become more important with increasing pore dimensionality (G. Wirnsberger et al., Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 2951–2953; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 2777). Analysis of the HgL3 EXAFS confirms a coordination number of two for Hg and gives HgX bond lengths of 2.26±0.02, 2.38±0.02 and 2.57±0.02 Å for the trapped HgCl2, HgBr2 and HgI2 molecules, respectively. These values are very close to those of the corresponding molecules in the vapour phase and are the shortest determined for HgX2 molecules in solid‐state compounds to date (a comparably short distance only appears in the recently reported [Cu(2‐pyrazinecarboxylato)2HgI2]⋅HgI2 with d(HgI)=2.577(2) Å; Dong et al., Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 4441–4443; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4271). Thus, there emerges a picture of almost unperturbed HgX2 molecules, similar to those in the vapour phase or in non‐coordinating solvents, in a solid crystalline matrix of high temperature stability, a very unusual state of matter. Despite the weakness of the host–guest interactions, investigations on small crystallites of the HgX2–TON composites using a Raman microscope show a strong polarization dependence, providing evidence for an orientational alignment of the HgX2 molecules inside the one‐dimensional pore system of this host. For these reasons, the host matrices used in this study can be viewed as orienting solid solvents, coordinating only very weakly to the inserted HgX2 guest molecules, but exhibiting a strong geometrical template function for their alignment. The concept of using electroneutral SiO2 modifications as host components for a modular construction of new host–guest compounds thus allows the designed construction of ordered guest assemblies, with the pore systems of the rigid host matrices acting as space‐confining and ordering templates for the guest components.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%