2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2022.102692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

10 m crop type mapping using Sentinel-2 reflectance and 30 m cropland data layer product

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Sentinel-2 image is tiled using the Military Grid Reference System (MGRS) grid and projected in the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) map projection, with each tile covering 109 × 109 km. The Sentinel-2 MSI has ten bands designed for land applications, including four 10 m bands (band 2-blue (490 nm), band 3-green (560 nm), band 4-red (665 nm), and band 8-nearinfrared (NIR) (842 nm)), four 20 m vegetation red edge bands (band 5 (705 nm), band 6 (740 nm), band 7 (783 nm), and band 8A (865 nm)), and two 20 m shortwave infrared bands (band 11 (1610 nm) and band 12 (2190 nm)) [63,89]. The 20 m Scene Classification (SCL) band is also produced by the Sen2Cor algorithm and included in the Sentinel-2 data to provide a classification map at 20 m pixels (snow, ice, cloud, cloud shadows, saturation, vegetation, not vegetated, and water), which will be nearest-neighbor resampled to 10 m to define cloud-free observations in our study.…”
Section: Sentinel-1 Sar Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Sentinel-2 image is tiled using the Military Grid Reference System (MGRS) grid and projected in the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) map projection, with each tile covering 109 × 109 km. The Sentinel-2 MSI has ten bands designed for land applications, including four 10 m bands (band 2-blue (490 nm), band 3-green (560 nm), band 4-red (665 nm), and band 8-nearinfrared (NIR) (842 nm)), four 20 m vegetation red edge bands (band 5 (705 nm), band 6 (740 nm), band 7 (783 nm), and band 8A (865 nm)), and two 20 m shortwave infrared bands (band 11 (1610 nm) and band 12 (2190 nm)) [63,89]. The 20 m Scene Classification (SCL) band is also produced by the Sen2Cor algorithm and included in the Sentinel-2 data to provide a classification map at 20 m pixels (snow, ice, cloud, cloud shadows, saturation, vegetation, not vegetated, and water), which will be nearest-neighbor resampled to 10 m to define cloud-free observations in our study.…”
Section: Sentinel-1 Sar Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the supervised classification method is able to map waterbodies effectively, the ground truth dataset is required to train the algorithm for classifying other unknown pixels and validate classification results [62]. However, collecting training and testing samples usually involves field visits, which are expensive, time-consuming, and challenging in remote and inaccessible regions [63]. This process is even more complex or unable to be conducted in areas with high water dynamics or severe flood events such as the VMD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This research used the Random Forest (RF) algorithm to identify different types of crops at first. RF is a robust voting decision algorithm by integrating multiple independent decision trees, and it is widely used for land cover classification in previous studies [14,40,41]. This algorithm is now well-integrated into the GEE platform with the classification library of "ee.Classifier.smileRandomForest()".…”
Section: Crop Type Identification and Rotation Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the influence of clouds, rain, and haze, the features generated by optical satellite images suffer the problem of discontinuity, which significantly increases the difficulty of crop classification. Different feature composites, such as the median composite [15,29,30], the percentile composite [19,31,32], and temporal interpolation [3,33], have been proposed to overcome or solve the discontinuity problem in optical satellite images. Many previous studies have indicated that the median composite was generally superior to the mean composite because the latter does not reflect the actual physical observation [33] and is susceptible to extreme values [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%