“…One view is that rangeland ecosystems reach a steadyestate equilibrium primarily in response to a fixed grazing pressure, which logically leads to the conclusion that rangeland degradation (loss of productivity) is attributable to excessive stocking rates per se (Lamprey, 1983;Dean and Macdonald, 1994). An alternative view is that rangelands are non-equilibrium systems responding primarily to variable and unpredictable rainfall, with biotic factors such as grazing exerting only marginal influence (Behnke and Scoones, 1993;Sandford, 1994;Scoones, 1994), which logically leads to the conclusion that fixed stocking rates are unsuitable and "opportunistic" grazing strategies should be employed (Westoby et al, 1989). These strategies typically involve de-stocking at the first indication of a pending drought and rapid restocking after the drought, with no provision for periodic de-stocking of pastures to allow for the recovery of defoliated vegetation, believed by many to be essential to maintain rangeland productivity, ecological function and resilience (Müller et al, 2007;Teague et al, 2004Teague et al, , 2011.…”