Biology and Conservation of Martens, Sables, and Fishers 2017
DOI: 10.7591/9780801466076-013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

10. Habitat Ecology of Fishers in Western North America: A New Synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, it is important to understand how this forest differs from that of other studies that suggest that extensive moderate to dense canopy cover is an important predictor of fisher habitat and where fisher home ranges consisted of less than 5% forest openings (e.g., [22]). Level of canopy cover has been termed dense (100-60%), moderate (59-40%), open (39-25%), and sparse (<25%) using the California Wildlife Habitat Relationship (CWHR) system by Mayer and Laudenslayer [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Third, it is important to understand how this forest differs from that of other studies that suggest that extensive moderate to dense canopy cover is an important predictor of fisher habitat and where fisher home ranges consisted of less than 5% forest openings (e.g., [22]). Level of canopy cover has been termed dense (100-60%), moderate (59-40%), open (39-25%), and sparse (<25%) using the California Wildlife Habitat Relationship (CWHR) system by Mayer and Laudenslayer [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we have analyzed an area where significant portions of the forest contain few large trees and where there are numerous openings in significantly greater proportions than previously reported in the literature [22] as being needed for fisher habitat. However, we have also shown that the few large trees that do exist, particularly those in areas where their numbers are higher, tend to be near den locations and within home ranges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the verifiable fisher map, non- and low-quality habitats occur primarily in areas that fishers did not occupy historically, such as high-elevation (> 1,524 m) montane regions, interior valleys and oak savannas, and areas of human settlement (Figs 1B and 4A) [21, 37]. In other portions of the analysis area in Washington and Oregon, including many lower elevation forests that supported fishers historically but no longer do [21], the model contains few large, contiguous areas of high-quality fisher habitat; rather, low- and medium-quality fisher habitats are common, widespread, and interspersed with relatively small patches of high-quality fisher habitat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In western North America, fishers are associated with low- to mid-elevation forests (generally < 1,250 m) where deep, soft snow does not accumulate, with relatively dense canopies and high structural diversity, including abundant large live trees, snags, and logs [16, 21, 3738]. Using gradient nearest neighbor (GNN) raster data derived from 2012 Landsat imagery and inventory plots [39], we selected 5 vegetative covariates that represented varying forest types, stand ages, and structural conditions: VEGCLASS (vegetation class), AGE (stand age), CANCOV (canopy cover), DDI (diameter diversity index), and QMD (quadratic mean diameter).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%