2014
DOI: 10.5937/industrija42-6944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

10.5937/industrija42-6944 = Transition economies during global economic crisis: A difference in differences approach

Abstract: This paper describes how the global economic crisis impacted economies in transition, which in terms of GDP decline, were the most negatively impacted economies in the world. Therefore the region went from a growth rate of around 8.4% in 2007 to -3.9% in 2009

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After that, gross domestic product decreased and this downfall is a very intensive in 2009 when it was a negatively of 3.9%. Similarly, countries in the region recorded decrease of 4.5% in the same period (Filipović and Miljković, 2014). However, observed indicator records a positive trend where it was 0.6 in 2015 which is more than 2014 when it decreased by 1.8%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…After that, gross domestic product decreased and this downfall is a very intensive in 2009 when it was a negatively of 3.9%. Similarly, countries in the region recorded decrease of 4.5% in the same period (Filipović and Miljković, 2014). However, observed indicator records a positive trend where it was 0.6 in 2015 which is more than 2014 when it decreased by 1.8%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Different technics has been used for the analyses of the football clubs efficiently and different results have been obtained (See: Barajas, Fernández-Jardón, & Liz, 2005; C. P. Barros, Garciadel-Barrio, & Leanch, 2009;Espitia-Escuer & García-Cebrián, 2010;Guzmán, 2006;Haas et al, 2004;Jardin, 2009;Mijatović et al, 2015;Pyatunin et al, 2016;Ribeiro & Lima, 2012;Samagaio, Couto, & Caiado, 2009;Soleimani-Damaneh, Hamidi, & Sajadi, 2011). The most part of these papers did not take into account the effects of the crises on the financial success of the analyzed clubs (See more in: Filipović & Miljković, 2014), neither the uses of different accounting treatment of the transfer fee on the financial success (see more in: Amira & Livne, 2005;Borré & Gelmini, 2008;Morrow, 1999;Rowbottom, 2002).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), the average growth rate of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the transition countries in 2007 was 8.7%, but plummeted to -3.9% in 2009 after the start of recession. Empirical research conducted on a sample of 29 transition countries in the period 2008-2013, showed that countries with slower progress of reforms implementation felt less negative effects of the crisis in 2009, with regard to GDP growth rate (Filipović, Miljković, 2014). Furthermore, this subgroup of transition countries more successfully overcame the crisis during 2009-2013, showing by 18% higher cumulative growth rate in a-five-year period than the transition countries that adopted all market economy principles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%