2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.06.277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

10:48 AM: Utility of Panendoscopy for Unknown Primary and Negative PET

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such cases, FDG-PET and PET/CT can help identify the primary malignant lesion [ Figure 5 ] in about 25% of cases. [ 13 14 ] At our center, a retrospective chart review revealed that using FDG-PET, we were able to identify the primary tumor in 61% of patients (14 of 23 cases) who presented with this scenario[ 15 ] with a very high negative predictive value (89%). Our higher rate of detection of the occult primary lesion may be attributable to several factors, including rigorous scan protocol (valium pre-treatment oral and intravenous hydration, 90-min delayed imaging), experienced readers, interpretations tuned to increase sensitivity (but not specificity) in this situation [ Figure 5 ] and a relatively small number of patients in this study.…”
Section: Fdg-pet and Pet/ct In Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases, FDG-PET and PET/CT can help identify the primary malignant lesion [ Figure 5 ] in about 25% of cases. [ 13 14 ] At our center, a retrospective chart review revealed that using FDG-PET, we were able to identify the primary tumor in 61% of patients (14 of 23 cases) who presented with this scenario[ 15 ] with a very high negative predictive value (89%). Our higher rate of detection of the occult primary lesion may be attributable to several factors, including rigorous scan protocol (valium pre-treatment oral and intravenous hydration, 90-min delayed imaging), experienced readers, interpretations tuned to increase sensitivity (but not specificity) in this situation [ Figure 5 ] and a relatively small number of patients in this study.…”
Section: Fdg-pet and Pet/ct In Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%