Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Abstract. We used a meta‐analysis to evaluate the hypothesis that diversified crops are subject to lower density of herbivorous insects. This method consists of integrating findings of independent studies by calculating the magnitude of treatment effects (effect size). A literature review covering a period of over 10 years yielded twenty‐one studies that contained sufficient information for the meta‐analysis. The data were analysed according to three criteria: yearly replications of the same study were considered independent data so that research repeated over time would have greater weight; a second meta‐analysis was conducted with results of only 1 year because of possible lack of independence between results of the same study; the third approach was to remove studies involving Brassica spp. from the analysis because they are redundant from the standpoint of testing a general hypothesis of crop diversification. The three analyses resulted in effect sizes of 0.50, 0.35 and 0.27, respectively, and all were statistically significant. These results correspond to 69%, 63% and 60% differences between average insect densities for treatment (diversified crops) and control groups. We considered the last criterion for data analysis as the most appropriate because of lowest bias from non‐independence between samples. Therefore we concluded that crop diversity caused moderate reduction of herbivorous insect populations. The implications and limitations of meta‐analyses are discussed.
Abstract. We used a meta‐analysis to evaluate the hypothesis that diversified crops are subject to lower density of herbivorous insects. This method consists of integrating findings of independent studies by calculating the magnitude of treatment effects (effect size). A literature review covering a period of over 10 years yielded twenty‐one studies that contained sufficient information for the meta‐analysis. The data were analysed according to three criteria: yearly replications of the same study were considered independent data so that research repeated over time would have greater weight; a second meta‐analysis was conducted with results of only 1 year because of possible lack of independence between results of the same study; the third approach was to remove studies involving Brassica spp. from the analysis because they are redundant from the standpoint of testing a general hypothesis of crop diversification. The three analyses resulted in effect sizes of 0.50, 0.35 and 0.27, respectively, and all were statistically significant. These results correspond to 69%, 63% and 60% differences between average insect densities for treatment (diversified crops) and control groups. We considered the last criterion for data analysis as the most appropriate because of lowest bias from non‐independence between samples. Therefore we concluded that crop diversity caused moderate reduction of herbivorous insect populations. The implications and limitations of meta‐analyses are discussed.
Interactions between weeds and arthropods occur frequently. This review covers the topic of weed/arthropod interactions, and provides the reader with access to literature in the subject area that is scattered in weed science, entomological, crop production, and ecological journals. We first analyze the current status of weed and arthropod management in the context of multidisciplinary integrated pest management (IPM). The remainder of the review is organized according to the mechanisms driving interactions. The first section deals with interactions driven by trophic relationships, and is subdivided into direct and indirect trophic interactions. Direct trophic interactions occur when pest or beneficial arthropods feed directly on weeds. Indirect trophic interactions occur when arthropod feeding damage to crops impacts weeds through alteration of ecosystem resource availability, or through weeds serving as hosts for alternate prey for beneficial arthropods, or via tritrophic interactions. The second mechanism driving interactions is considered in relation to alteration of the physical habitat by the presence of weeds, such as alteration of temperature within the plant canopy. The third major mechanism driving interactions is based on control tactics for the two types of pests. These are considered from the aspect of direct physical effects, such as tillage, and from the aspect of interactions resulting from the use of pesticides. The latter is divided into direct effects of herbicides and insecticides on non-target pests and beneficials, and on interactions that result from alteration of host plant physiology by pesticides. A conclusion section attempts to place the impact of interactions into an IPM framework, and to indicate where multidisciplinary research involving weed and arthropod management should be focused in the future.
Early weed removal in canola gives the crop a competitive advantage over weeds and is therefore widely recommended for optimal crop production, but no studies have been undertaken previously to determine the effect of this practice on insect infestations. Four field experiments were conducted at Lacombe and Beaverlodge, AB, Canada, in 1999–2001 for a total of 10 site-years to determine the effect of time of weed removal on root maggot (Delia spp.) egg deposition and larval damage to taproots. The experiments also investigated the effects of other factors such as cultivar, seeding date, herbicide application rate, fertilizer rate and placement, and use of a nitrification inhibitor on root maggot damage and oviposition. Damage to taproots and oviposition declined by approximately 6 and 23%, respectively, with a delay in weed removal from the two- to six-leaf stage of canola development. The effect of time of weed removal on root maggot damage and egg density sometimes varied with site and cultivar, but the main effect of time of weed removal was more prominent (smaller P values) than interactions with site. The most plausible explanation for this effect relates to the behavioral sequence of events that precedes oviposition in mated, gravid female flies. Heterogeneous environments, such as weedy backgrounds in canola plantings, minimize opportunities for females of Delia spp. to complete the behavioral sequence required for oviposition, leading to reduced infestation levels in weedy systems. However, yield improvements achieved with early weed removal exceeded the yield benefit derived by lowered root maggot pressure when weeds were removed later. Nevertheless, current efforts to reduce pesticide use in agriculture may promote broader adoption of cultural control strategies for weed and root maggot management. In some situations, it may then be appropriate to ameliorate root maggot damage by maintaining some weedy background.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.