Receptive Ecumenism and the Call to Catholic Learning 2008
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199216451.003.0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1 Receptive Ecumenism and Catholic Learning—Establishing the Agenda1

Abstract: This chapter introduces the Receptive Ecumenism and Catholic Learning project, the key thinking that drives it, and its core theological, ecclesiological, and practical implications. It unfolds in five steps. The first section briefly identifies the fundamental ecclesial-theological context and presuppositions within which the project is situated. The second and third sections deal, respectively, with the broader intellectual and ecclesial-historical contexts that have also helped shape the thinking and vision… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…63 Deploying deep approaches to learning, like receptive learning, is an exercise in 'collaborative ecclesial learning', a poiesis or constructive activity, which is necessarily a 'collegial process'. 64 If so, then, as this article suggests, deep approaches to learning offer a vision for ecclesial learning that will draw on the creative but transformative tension of learning that is 'world-involving' precisely because it is 'God-involving' and vice versa. The temptation for churches at present is to mirror shallow approaches to mission and mission-shaped churches in the face of plurality…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…63 Deploying deep approaches to learning, like receptive learning, is an exercise in 'collaborative ecclesial learning', a poiesis or constructive activity, which is necessarily a 'collegial process'. 64 If so, then, as this article suggests, deep approaches to learning offer a vision for ecclesial learning that will draw on the creative but transformative tension of learning that is 'world-involving' precisely because it is 'God-involving' and vice versa. The temptation for churches at present is to mirror shallow approaches to mission and mission-shaped churches in the face of plurality…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the members of ARCIC continue to develop fresh strategies for seeking to serve this need (Murray 2011, 205-206). It is in direct relation to this context and its challenges, and in creative continuity with the work of ARCIC, that the strategy which has come to be referred to as 'receptive ecumenism' has been devised and tested as charting a way for contemporary ecumenism (Murray 2008a(Murray , 2008b(Murray , 2015Murray and Murray 2012). It proceeds by bringing to the fore the dispositions of self-critical hospitality, humble learning, and ongoing conversion that have always been quietly essential to good ecumenical work and by turning them into the explicit required strategy and core task of contemporary ecumenism.…”
Section: Achievements and Limits Of Traditional Bilateral Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Paul Murray notes: 'More pervasive has been the sense that ecumenical engagement is made easier when it focuses on collaborating in practical activities of service and mission rather than on unravelling arcane matters of faith and order regarded as blocking the way to structural unity.' 35 Both of these are of course important and even necessary, but neither approach seems to account for the type of unity present within Pentecostalism. There is no real interest in doctrinal agreement among their members or in significant collaboration in service and mission -if anything there is more an attitude of going it alone and protecting one's own territory.…”
Section: A Paradoxical Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%