2005
DOI: 10.1039/b506840a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(1-Naphthyl)phenylamino functionalized three-coordinate organoboron compounds: syntheses, structures, and applications in OLEDs

Abstract: New three-coordinate organoboron compounds functionalized by a (1-naphthyl)phenylamino group, B(mes) 2 (dbp-NPB) (1), B(db-NPB) 3 (2), and B(dbp-NPB) 3 (3), have been synthesized. A variable temperature 1 H NMR study showed that the aryl groups around the boron center in these compounds have a rotation barrier y70 kJ mol 21 . The new boron compounds are amorphous solids with T g being 110 uC, 171 uC and 173 uC, respectively. The electronic properties of the new boron compounds were investigated by cyclic volta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
48
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(7 reference statements)
6
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in the CHCl 3 solution, the emission λ max of PEIN‐3 is 426 nm, while in DMF the emission λ max becomes 457 nm. This observed solvent‐dependent emission is consistent with the presence of a highly polarized excited state, which is resulted from the donor‐acceptor charge transfer in the excitation process . Furthermore, one striking difference among PEIN‐1–3 is the emission intensity in the different solvents (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…For example, in the CHCl 3 solution, the emission λ max of PEIN‐3 is 426 nm, while in DMF the emission λ max becomes 457 nm. This observed solvent‐dependent emission is consistent with the presence of a highly polarized excited state, which is resulted from the donor‐acceptor charge transfer in the excitation process . Furthermore, one striking difference among PEIN‐1–3 is the emission intensity in the different solvents (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Unfortunately, for BMes 3 no coalescence temperature is observable, because the two isomers are enantiomers. However, Wang and co‐workers reported activation energies of Mes 2 B‐(duryl) and Mes 2 B‐(phenyl) compounds of 16.6 and 10.3 kcal mol −1 , respectively, which are consistent with the previous reported studies …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The starting material 2‐(2‐bromophenyl)‐1,3‐dioxolane was purchased from Sigma–Aldrich without further purification. The BMes 2 F compound was prepared according to a literature procedure . Prior to use, all solvents were dried over 3 Å molecular sieves for 48 h, freshly distilled under nitrogen, degassed, and stored in a glovebox.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 19.2(1) kcal mol À1 activation energy of the third process, BÀCM es group rotation,o f 1S-Me is much higherthan the rotationbarrierobserved previously in triarylboranes peciess uch as BMes 2 Ar (Ar = phenylo r duryl). [8] These processes of major-minor Mes rotationa nd their back-and-forth motions aroundt he boron atom, asi llustrated in Figure 3, are believed to be collectively responsible for the overall diastereomer exchange phenomenon in these systems.…”
Section: Structural Dynamicso Fchiral B(bza-r)mes 2 In Solutionmentioning
confidence: 97%