Coleoptera, Beetles, Volume 2, Morphology and Systematics (Elateroidea, Bostrichiformia, Cucujiformia Partim) 2010
DOI: 10.1515/9783110911213.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1. Changes in classification and list of families and subfamilies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The monophyly of the group has been doubted based on morphological characters as well [20,68,92]. We consider Jacobsoniidae a member The enigmatic Rhinorhipidae, represented in the recent fauna by only a single species endemic to northeastern Australia, are resolved with strong support as an isolated branch falling outside of Elateriformia (where it was placed by Lawrence and Newton [93]). We propose to include the family in a series of its own, Rhinorhipiformia Cai, Engel and Tihelka ser.…”
Section: Taxonomic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The monophyly of the group has been doubted based on morphological characters as well [20,68,92]. We consider Jacobsoniidae a member The enigmatic Rhinorhipidae, represented in the recent fauna by only a single species endemic to northeastern Australia, are resolved with strong support as an isolated branch falling outside of Elateriformia (where it was placed by Lawrence and Newton [93]). We propose to include the family in a series of its own, Rhinorhipiformia Cai, Engel and Tihelka ser.…”
Section: Taxonomic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Scarabaeidae are part of a wider clade (Scarabaeoidea) which also includes Lucanidae (stag beetles), Geotrupidae (earth-boring dung beetles) and several other families (Scholtz & Grebennikov 2005), and the monophyly of this superfamily has been confirmed by all major molecular studies (e.g., Zhang et al 2018, McKenna et al 2019. The current classification of Scarabaeoidea (Scholtz & Grebennikov 2005) is founded on morphological evidence (Lawrence & Newton 1995). Yet, despite extensive research on the morphology of Scarabaeoidea by Browne & Scholtz (1998, 1999, the monophyly of Scarabaeidae has yet to be adequately tested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specimens were compared with voucher specimens housed in collections at the Institute of Tropical Biology and Conservation (ITBC) located at University Malaysia Sabah (UMS) and the Forest Research Centre (FRC) in Sandakan, Sabah. Other references used for beetle identification include keys by Lawrence and Newton (1995), Lawrence et al (2000), and Chung (2003). Specimen collections are stored at the Entomology lab, University Malaysia Sabah.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other references used for beetle identification include keys by Lawrence and Newton (1995), Lawrence et al (2000), andChung (2003). Specimen collections are stored at the Entomology lab, University Malaysia Sabah.…”
Section: Biodiversity Assessment On Different Tree Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%