1999
DOI: 10.1107/s0907444999003972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1.7 Å structure of the stabilized REIv mutant T39K. Application of local NCS restraints

Abstract: The X-ray structure of the T39K mutant of the variable domain of a human immunoglobulin kappa light chain has been determined at room temperature to 1.7 A resolution with a conventional R factor of 0. 182. T39K crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1 [a = 35.4 (1), b = 40.1 (1), c = 43.1 (1) A, alpha = 66.9 (1), beta = 85.4 (1), gamma = 73.8 (1) degrees ]. The unit-cell contains two monomers, related by a non-crystallographic twofold axis. The use of a novel type of local non-crystallographic symmetry res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some facilities such as conjugate-gradient refinement (Konnert, 1976), the free R factor (Brunger, 1992) and non-crystallographic symmetry (NCS) restraints (Usó n, Pohl et al, 1999) were added specially for macromolecular refinement, there are also features missing that would be desirable for macromolecules, such as a way of defining peptide and DNA chains, FFT-based structure-factor calculation, maximum-likelihood refinement, torsion-angle restraints, TLS restraints or constraints for anisotropic refinement and a more sophisticated solvent model. Torsionangle restraints were deliberately left out so that backbone and side-chain torsion angles could be used for verification purposes, e.g.…”
Section: Macromolecular Refinement With Shelxlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some facilities such as conjugate-gradient refinement (Konnert, 1976), the free R factor (Brunger, 1992) and non-crystallographic symmetry (NCS) restraints (Usó n, Pohl et al, 1999) were added specially for macromolecular refinement, there are also features missing that would be desirable for macromolecules, such as a way of defining peptide and DNA chains, FFT-based structure-factor calculation, maximum-likelihood refinement, torsion-angle restraints, TLS restraints or constraints for anisotropic refinement and a more sophisticated solvent model. Torsionangle restraints were deliberately left out so that backbone and side-chain torsion angles could be used for verification purposes, e.g.…”
Section: Macromolecular Refinement With Shelxlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure determination was completed by iterative cycles of model building and refinement with SHELXL 41. Local NCS symmetry restraints were only used in the initial phases of refinement in order to improved convergence 42. The course of the refinement was carefully monitored by using 5 % of the reflections to calculated free R factors,43 and completed by restrained anisotropic refinement against all data by using a conjugate gradient method as implemented in SHELXL 41.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common displacement of the crystal as a whole (lattice vibrations) (12, 14, 15) contributes equally to all atoms, and therefore it is possible to account for this effect directly while performing overall anisotropic scaling of the model with respect to the diffraction data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%