2014 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium (IMS2014) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/mwsym.2014.6848521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1.5–2.7 GHz ultra low noise bypass LNA

Abstract: B y pass low-noise amplifier (LNA) can be used in the base station receiver to improve the d y namic range. It is difficult to achieve both ultra low noise at LNA mode and maintain good linearit y at b y pass mode simultaneousl y . In this work, we present the best performance b y pass LNA with 0.5 dB of noise figure (NF), 20 dB of gain at 1.95 GHz and high OIP3 of 35 dBm for both LNA and b y pass mode. Fabricated in 0.25um GaAs EID pHEMT process, the LNA is based on enhancement mode pHEMT cascode topolog y an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To quantify the performance of our LNPA with the state of art LNAs and PAs, we used a modified version of ITRS LNA-FOM [21] that has all the design parameters of LNA and PA, which is defined as. [28]) across various device technologies in the literature, with a FoM of 11.5x10 6 . Being a LNPA, it offers one of the highest IIP3 and OP 1dB while maintaining a low NF of 1.07 dB, offering a better performance than contemporary designs in the same band.…”
Section: B Process Variation and Comparison With Existing Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify the performance of our LNPA with the state of art LNAs and PAs, we used a modified version of ITRS LNA-FOM [21] that has all the design parameters of LNA and PA, which is defined as. [28]) across various device technologies in the literature, with a FoM of 11.5x10 6 . Being a LNPA, it offers one of the highest IIP3 and OP 1dB while maintaining a low NF of 1.07 dB, offering a better performance than contemporary designs in the same band.…”
Section: B Process Variation and Comparison With Existing Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%