2014
DOI: 10.1039/c3nj01226c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1,4-Dialkyl-1,4-diazabutadienes: their reactions with aluminum and indium halides

Abstract: Reactions of 1,4-bis[(S) methylbenzyl]-1,4-diazabutadiene (1), 1,4-bis[(R) 1 0 -chlorobutan-2 0 -yl]-1,4-diazabutadiene (2), 1,4-bis[(S,S) 1 0 -chloro-1 0 -phenyl-propan-2 0 -yl]-1,4-diazabutadiene (3), and 1,4-di-tert-butyl-1,4diazabutadiene (4) with aluminum and indium halides were performed. Reaction of 1,4-diazabutadienes 1-4 with two equivalents of aluminum halides in toluene afforded ionic aluminum coordination compounds (5-10) which in THF solution are transformed into 1,3-dialkyl-2-methaneiminealkyl im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no systematic trend in these metrics across the complexes. The C–C bond distances in our compounds are slightly longer than those reported for either the [(dipp-DAB)­AlI 2 ]­[I] [C–C = 1.442(13) Å; C–N = 1.325(12) and 1.289(11) Å] or [( t Bu-DAB)­AlClMe]­[AlCl 3 Me] [C–C = 1.459(9) Å; C–N = 1.284(7) and 1.279(8) Å] neutral ligand complex, although the C–N distances are in better agreement. Our bonding metrics also compare well to the average C–C (1.51 Å) and C–N (1.28 Å) bond distances reported for the neutral ligand complex [(dmp-BIAN) 3 Al]­[PF 6 ] 3 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There is no systematic trend in these metrics across the complexes. The C–C bond distances in our compounds are slightly longer than those reported for either the [(dipp-DAB)­AlI 2 ]­[I] [C–C = 1.442(13) Å; C–N = 1.325(12) and 1.289(11) Å] or [( t Bu-DAB)­AlClMe]­[AlCl 3 Me] [C–C = 1.459(9) Å; C–N = 1.284(7) and 1.279(8) Å] neutral ligand complex, although the C–N distances are in better agreement. Our bonding metrics also compare well to the average C–C (1.51 Å) and C–N (1.28 Å) bond distances reported for the neutral ligand complex [(dmp-BIAN) 3 Al]­[PF 6 ] 3 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…The Al–N distances in the [Al­(L Ar ) 2 Cl 2 ]­AlCl 4 complexes average 2.05 Å, which is slightly longer than the corresponding average bond length in either [(diip-DAB)­AlI 2 ]­[I] (Al–N ave = 1.92 Å) or [( t Bu-DAB)­AlClMe]­[AlCl 3 Me] (Al–N = 1.96 Å) . These distances for the neutral ligand complexes are all longer than the average Al–N distances in previously reported singly (1.90 Å) ,,,,, and doubly (1.82 Å),, reduced aluminum α-diimine adducts, as is anticipated from the lesser Coulombic attraction between the aluminum­(III) ion and neutral ligand.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several isomers are possible for L1–L5 on the basis of Z , E -isomerism about the CN bonds, s-cis / s-trans isomerism and anti / syn isomerism as a result of hindered rotation of the N -aryl groups (Scheme 2). 5 g , h , j ,6 c ,15 Given that L2 (R 1 = Me, R 2 = Et) shows peaks for one compound in its 1 H NMR spectrum (see Fig. S2†), it would suggest that E , E / Z , E and s-cis / s-trans interconversions for both L2 - anti and L2 - syn are fast on the laboratory timescale at room temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%