“…Similar situation occurred in case of 1,3,3-trimethyl-1,3-azasilinane [31] and 1,3-dimethyl-3-silapiperidine [32], for which the equatorial position of the methyl groups is absolutely dominating. Thus, introducing a substituent such With basis set 6-311G** Dr = r h1 -r a , The vibrational corrections Dr were calculated by the SHRINK program [25,26] using the so-called second approximation, in which a harmonic approach with nonlinear relation between Cartesian and internal coordinates was applied on the base of the force field estimated in the QC calculations at MP2/ 6-311G** level a A group number in which the amplitude was refined (see ''GED analysis'' section) as cyclohexyl, in our case, did not affect the conformational preferences of piperidine.…”