2007
DOI: 10.1002/j.2334-5837.2007.tb02858.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1.3.3 Hybrid System Dynamic, Petri Net, and Agent‐Based Modeling of the Air and Space Operations Center

Abstract: In an earlier paper, an existing Air and Space Operations Center (AOC) process model (i.e., Petri net) and new global and mission models for the environment in which the AOC operates (i.e., System Dynamics) were linked (federated). The focus of this paper is the development of an operator‐environment model (i.e., Agent‐Based Model). An existing systems framework for attention allocation of operators within the AOC has been implemented that supports multiple modeling paradigms. The results for linking the Petri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different terms have been used to describe what we call here a level: e.g., perspective, interaction, layer or view (Desmeulles et al, 2009;Parunak et al, 2009;Torii et al, 2005;White, 2007). Some are domain-specific; thus, in the flow modeling domain, when two levels with static relations are considered, models are often described as hybrid as shown in the section 3.2 (Burghout et al, 2005;El hmam et al, 2008El hmam et al, , 2006aMarino et al, 2011;Mathieu et al, 2007a;Nguyen et al, 2012b;Rejniak and Anderson, 2011;Wakeland et al, 2007).…”
Section: Terminology Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different terms have been used to describe what we call here a level: e.g., perspective, interaction, layer or view (Desmeulles et al, 2009;Parunak et al, 2009;Torii et al, 2005;White, 2007). Some are domain-specific; thus, in the flow modeling domain, when two levels with static relations are considered, models are often described as hybrid as shown in the section 3.2 (Burghout et al, 2005;El hmam et al, 2008El hmam et al, , 2006aMarino et al, 2011;Mathieu et al, 2007a;Nguyen et al, 2012b;Rejniak and Anderson, 2011;Wakeland et al, 2007).…”
Section: Terminology Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%