2015
DOI: 10.1107/s2053230x1501643x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1.25 Å resolution structure of an RNA 20-mer that binds to the TREX2 complex

Abstract: The 1.25 Å resolution H32:R crystal structure of a 20 nt ribonucleotide that binds to the TREX-2 complex with high affinity shows a double-stranded RNA duplex arranged along a crystallographic 3 1 axis in which the antiparallel chains overlap by 18 nucleotides and are related by a crystallographic twofold axis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, both predictions are within error of the measured value. The average ( n + 2)­H8- n H2′/H3′ distance is 5.71 Å for A-form RNA double helixes in crystal structures. , In MD simulations, both OL3 and ROC-RNA give an average distance of 3.26 Å for C2 extruded structures, providing an estimate of 39% (+54%/–25%) of C2 extruded in NMR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, both predictions are within error of the measured value. The average ( n + 2)­H8- n H2′/H3′ distance is 5.71 Å for A-form RNA double helixes in crystal structures. , In MD simulations, both OL3 and ROC-RNA give an average distance of 3.26 Å for C2 extruded structures, providing an estimate of 39% (+54%/–25%) of C2 extruded in NMR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They average 2.52 Å for r­(CAAU), 2.68 Å for r­(UCAAUC), 3.13 Å for d­(CAAU), and 3.48 Å for d­(UCAAUC). Equivalent distances for RNA and DNA double helixes are typically 2.4 Å and 2.9 Å, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The localization of TREX-2 to NPCs, which appears to be important for all of these functions, appears to derive primarily from the interaction of the CID domain (Sac3 residues 720–805, together with Cdc31 and two Sus1 chains) with Nup1, a component of the NPC nuclear basket ( 10 , 17 , 18 ), whereas the M- and N- regions appear to be important growth, mRNA export, localization of genes such as GAL 7-10-1 cluster and the integration of many of the nuclear steps in the gene expression pathway. Previous work has implicated positively charged residues in the Sac3 M-region with the interaction with both RNAs ( 16 , 38 ) and with the Mediator complex ( 15 ). In the latter case, it is unlikely that one of the Sac3 residues proposed as interacting with the Mediator complex, Arg256, is involved directly because it is inaccessible (Figure 3 and Supplementary Movies 2 and 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TREX-2 complex is based on a Sac3 scaffold to which Thp1, Sem1, Cdc31, and two copies of Sus1 bind ( Fig. 1 A) and broadly speaking, the TREX-2 complex can be subdivided into three regions: the Sac3 N-terminus (Sac3 N ; residues 1–100), which harbors degenerate FG-like repeats similar to those seen in many nuclear pore proteins (FG nucleoporins) ( Fischer et al, 2002 ); the M-subcomplex, consisting of Sac3 residues ∼100–551 bound to Thp1 and Sem1, which forms a nucleic acid binding module as well as docking site for components of the Mediator complex ( Ellisdon et al, 2012 , Schneider et al, 2015 , Valkov and Stewart, 2015 ); and the CID-subcomplex, consisting of Sac3 residues ∼720–805 bound to Cdc31 and two Sus1 chains and which, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , binds to the nuclear pore complex (NPC) to tether the complex close to the nuclear basket to facilitate localization of genes such as GAL1 ( Jani et al, 2014 , Jani et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%